CVE-2026-126607: Uncontrolled Search Path Element in hMailServer
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 31/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.17% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.3 through 6.3.7 on Windows, with a MySQL or MariaDB database, hands the bundled MariaDB Connector/C the folder of its authentication plugins (the plugin folder in the installation's Bin folder) as Latin-1 bytes, which the client reads in the system's ANSI code page when it builds a plugin's path and loads the plugin with LoadLibraryExA, which allows a local authenticated user to execute code as the hMailServer service's account (LocalSystem, or the service's virtual account for a new installation from 6.3.4) by creating the folder those bytes name in the code page and placing in it a DLL with a plugin's name, when the installation folder's path holds a character between U+0080 and U+00FF whose byte the code page reads as another character, and none above U+00FF, and the user can create that other folder (by default any authenticated user may create a folder directly under the root of the system drive). The server converted the path with the C runtime's wcstombs_s in the C locale, which writes each character up to U+00FF as the byte of the same value: on code page 1252 those bytes are the same letters, while on another code page, such as 1251, or on a UTF-8 code page, they name another folder. The client loads the plugin the database server names in its greeting, unless it is built in, and any plugin the server names in an authentication switch, and tries again at each connection while a load fails, so with a MySQL 8.0 or later server, whose greeting names caching_sha2_password by default, the DLL is loaded at the next connection the service makes, whatever plugin the database account uses; a DLL's entry point runs when it is loaded. A path holding any character above U+00FF was handed over as an empty string, whatever the code page, from which the client makes a plugin's name at the root of the current drive: for the service, whose current folder is System32, that is the root of the system drive, where by default only administrators can create a file, but the server's own database commands (hMailServer.exe --check-database, --upgrade-database and the others from 6.3.4, and the /Debug and /Test console modes from 6.2.3) run in the folder they are started from - the product tells administrators to run them from an elevated prompt in the Bin folder, and the setup of 6.3.4 and 6.3.5 ran two or three of them itself with the Bin folder as their working folder for a new installation with an external database - so a DLL that a local authenticated user placed under a plugin's name at the root of a drive other users may write, such as a FAT or exFAT volume, was loaded into the administrator's process at the command's first connection to a MySQL 8.0 or later server. 6.3.8 fixes both cases: it hands the folder in the code page's bytes or by its short (8.3) name, and where neither can be written, a folder under the Windows system folder that holds no plugin and that only administrators can create, or else refuses the connection before attempting it; it never hands the empty value or a folder the current drive completes. The configuration is not the default: the default installation folder, under Program Files, is ASCII. Linux builds set no plugin folder and are not affected.
- Published
- Nov 11, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 11, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 6th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-427
Report tools
Action score
31
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 31 / 40 · 7.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitLab
- 7.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitLab). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Progressive Robot Ltd hMailServer
- 6.2.3 and later · up to and including 6.3.7affected · semver
Same product
progressive robot ltd: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-100741Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') in hMailServer40Plan
- CVE-2026-126617Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in hMailServer35Monitor
- CVE-2026-114489Missing Authorization in hMailServer32Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-114479Oct 21, 2026 · Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') in hMailServer23Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-114490Oct 21, 2026 · Incorrect Authorization in hMailServer31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-126609Nov 11, 2026 · Improper Certificate Validation in hMailServer30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-427 · Uncontrolled Search Path ElementCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
- Hijack Execution Flow:DLL search order hijackingT1574.001
- Hijack Execution Flow: Dylib HijackingT1574.004
- Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
- Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by Search Order HijackingT1574.008
- Hijack Execution Flow: Path Interception by Unquoted PathT1574.009
Change log
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.