CVE-2026-124008: Dixell/Copeland XWEB EVO OS Command Injection via devices.lua
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
XWEB EVO 5.2.3 through 5.8.8 contains an authenticated OS command injection vulnerability in the devices.lua template handling, which allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands by injecting unescaped template source into unzip and related shell commands. Attackers can exploit this flaw through the wlua interpreter to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the affected device. This product line reached it's end of service date in March 2026.
- Published
- Nov 12, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 12, 2026
- EPSS
- —
- CWE
- CWE-78
Report tools
Action score
34
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · —
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 8.6
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Copeland XWEB EVO
- 5.2.3 and later · up to and including 5.8.8affected · semver
Same product
copeland: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-124010Dixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Unauthenticated Command Injection via xwconsole.cgi37Monitor
- CVE-2026-124004Dixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Hardcoded Administrator Backdoor Password37Monitor
- CVE-2026-124002Dixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Pre-Auth OS Command Injection via Username37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-124006Nov 12, 2026 · Dixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Predictable Root Password Generation36Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-124007Nov 12, 2026 · Dixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Pre-Auth OS Command Injection via Password Field36Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-124009Nov 12, 2026 · Dixell/Copeland XWEB EVO OS Command Injection via backup.lua34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1240100 days apartDixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Unauthenticated Command Injection via xwconsole.cgi37Monitor
- CVE-2026-1240020 days apartDixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Pre-Auth OS Command Injection via Username37Monitor
- CVE-2026-1240070 days apartDixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Pre-Auth OS Command Injection via Password Field36Monitor
- CVE-2026-1240090 days apartDixell/Copeland XWEB EVO OS Command Injection via backup.lua34Monitor
- CVE-2026-1240130 days apartDixell/Copeland XWEB EVO OS Command Injection via api.lua34Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-1240120 days apartDixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Hardcoded Administrator Daily Password Authentication Bypass36Monitor
- CVE-2026-1240140 days apartDixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Unauthenticated Configuration Write via config.lua35Monitor
- CVE-2026-1240150 days apartDixell/Copeland XWEB EVO Authentication Bypass via users.lua32Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;
exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;
if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.