CVE-2026-123298: In JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52556 sMTP command injection via email verification was possible
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 20/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.63% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 51.1% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: JetBrains Hub 2026.2.52556.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to JetBrains Hub 2026.2.52556 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
- Published
- Nov 6, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 7, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 51th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-93
Report tools
Action score
20
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 20 / 40 · 5.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · JetBrains
- 5.0
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (JetBrains). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
JetBrains Hub
- before 2026.2.52556affected · semver
Same product
jetbrains: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-86480In JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52442 an unauthenticated attacker could register a trusted service and gain superuser privileges39Monitor
- CVE-2026-56141In JetBrains Hub before 2026.1.13757,
2025.3.148033,
2025.2.148048,
2025.1.148120,
2024.3.148430,
2024.2.148429 account takeover via…39Monitor
- CVE-2026-50242In JetBrains Hub before 2026.1.13757,
2025.3.148033,
2025.2.148048,
2025.1.148120,
2024.3.148430,
2024.2.148429 authentication bypass via…39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-123296Nov 6, 2026 · In JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52519 privilege escalation via forged email verification was possible30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-123297Nov 6, 2026 · In JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52519 two-factor authentication bypass was possible via the password reset flow27Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-123299Nov 6, 2026 · In JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52519 information disclosure via user search queries was possible12Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| JetBrains Hub | 2026.2.52556 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 14, 2026+8 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-8648060 days apartIn JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52442 an unauthenticated attacker could register a trusted service and gain superuser privileges39Monitor
- CVE-2026-50242140 days apartIn JetBrains Hub before 2026.1.13757,
2025.3.148033,
2025.2.148048,
2025.1.148120,
2024.3.148430,
2024.2.148429 authentication bypass via…39Monitor
- CVE-2026-1232970 days apartIn JetBrains Hub before 2026.2.52519 two-factor authentication bypass was possible via the password reset flow27Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-93 · Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.