CVE-2026-121022: Default Administrator Password Change Not Enforced in Axxon One Web Client
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.37% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: AxxonSoft Axxon One 3.0.0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to AxxonSoft Axxon One 3.0.0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Use of Default Password (CWE-1393) in the web client in AxxonSoft Axxon One before 3.0.0 on Windows and Linux allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to log in as the built-in administrator with the default credentials on a newly installed system, because the web client did not enforce the mandatory change of the default password on first login.
- Published
- Nov 3, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 3, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 32th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-1393
Report tools
Action score
36
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · AxxonSoft
- 8.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (AxxonSoft). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
AxxonSoft Axxon One
- before 3.0.0affected · semver
Same product
axxonsoft: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-10226PostgreSQL Upgrade from v10 to v17.4 in AxxonSoft Axxon One (C-Werk) 2.0.8 and earlier to Address Multiple Vulnerabilities37Monitor
- CVE-2025-10220Outdated Third-Party NuGet Packages in AxxonSoft Axxon One VMS 2.0.0 through 2.0.437Monitor
- CVE-2025-10225Incorrect Memory Allocation in OpenSSL-Based Session Module in AxxonSoft Axxon One (C-Werk)34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-10227Sep 10, 2025 · Lack of Encryption in Object Archive in AxxonSoft Axxon One (C-Werk) before 2.0.820Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-121020Nov 3, 2026 · User and Role Enumeration by Low-Privileged Users in Axxon One Security Configuration API21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-121021Nov 3, 2026 · Plaintext Storage of LDAP Password in Axxon One Shared Configuration27Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| AxxonSoft Axxon One | 3.0.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 13, 2026+10 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-1393 · Use of Default PasswordCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
- CVSS8.1 → 9.2
- Severityhigh → critical
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.