CVE-2026-120495: Arbitrary file write and code execution via crafted Synthetic Monitoring agent data
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 37/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.46% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Checkmk GmbH Checkmk 2.4.0p40, 2.5.0p19.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Checkmk GmbH Checkmk 2.4.0p40, 2.5.0p19 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Path traversal in the Synthetic Monitoring "Robotmk" test service of Checkmk <2.5.0p19, <2.4.0p40, and 2.3.0 (EOL) allows an attacker who controls the agent output of a monitored host's check output for a host to inject a crafted robot output to define the contents and location for the generated HTML log, leading to code execution as the site user.
- Published
- Nov 11, 2026
- Updated
- Nov 11, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 40th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-23
Report tools
Action score
37
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 37 / 40 · 9.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Checkmk
- 9.4
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Checkmk). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Checkmk GmbH Checkmk
- 2.3.0affected
- 2.5.0 and later · before 2.5.0p19affected · semver
- 2.4.0 and later · before 2.4.0p40affected · semver
Same product
checkmk gmbh: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-121374Arbitrary file write and code execution via excluded node roles in Kubernetes special agent37Monitor
- CVE-2026-118965Path traversal in host label synchronization allows code execution on the central site from a remote site37Monitor
- CVE-2026-14452Open redirect and XSS via reset_url parameter34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-103674Nov 6, 2026 · NetApp ONTAP special agent exposes password in process list8Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-103682Nov 6, 2026 · Jolokia special agent exposes password in process list8Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-111573Nov 6, 2026 · Privilege escalation via unprotected Windows agent data folder25Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Checkmk GmbH Checkmk | 2.4.0p40 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Checkmk GmbH Checkmk | 2.5.0p19 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 13, 2026+2 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-1557682 days apartAgent receiver accepts mTLS requests without a client certificate27Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-23 · Relative Path TraversalCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (2)
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.