CVE-2026-11800: Org.keycloak:keycloak-services: keycloak: authentication bypass via jwt algorithm confusion
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.26% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: org.keycloak:keycloak-services (Maven) 26.6.4.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Upgrade to org.keycloak:keycloak-services (Maven) 26.6.4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in Keycloak. This JWT algorithm confusion vulnerability in the JWT Authorization Grant flow allows an attacker with valid client credentials to bypass signature verification. By forging an assertion, the attacker can create unauthorized access tokens. This enables the attacker to impersonate any federated user linked to the affected Identity Provider, leading to unauthorized access and potential privilege escalation.
- Published
- Jun 25, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 25, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 18th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-347
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 8.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| redhat | build of keycloak | cpe:2.3:a:redhat:build_of_keycloak |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- redhat build of keycloak26.6 and later · before 26.6.4
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Red Hat Red Hat Build of Keycloak
- all versionsaffected
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6
- 26.6.4-2 and laternot affected · rpm
- 26.6-8 and laternot affected · rpm
- 26.6-8 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat build of Keycloak 26.6.4
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Data Grid 8
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Single Sign-On 7
- all versionsunknown
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maven | org.keycloak:keycloak-services | before 26.6.4 | 26.6.4 |
Same product
redhat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-16442Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: saml idp-initiated broker login bypasses link-only restriction39Monitor
- CVE-2026-16443Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: saml broker metadata import disables response signature validation36Monitor
- CVE-2026-15572Keycloak-services: keycloak-services: dcr protocol mapper type-swap policy bypass allows privilege escalation35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-9799Jun 25, 2026 · Keycloak: keycloak: unauthorized access to resources via uma permission ticket bypass18Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-9800Jun 25, 2026 · Keycloak-policy-enforcer: keycloak policy enforcer: authorization bypass via incorrect uri comparison32Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-14209Jun 30, 2026 · Keycloak-admin-ui: keycloak-admin-ui:admin ui extension brute-force-user endpoint bypasses fgapv2 user view restrictions17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Maven:org.keycloak:keycloak-services | 26.6.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×3
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-11-09 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-11-10 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:0 | 2026-11-10 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+136 d
- TodayNov 11, 2026+139 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1644341 days apartKeycloak-services: keycloak-services: saml broker metadata import disables response signature validation36Monitor
- CVE-2026-979328 days apartKeycloak: keycloak: security policy bypass in jwe-encrypted request object processing30Monitor
- CVE-2026-1856940 days apartKeycloak-services: keycloak-services: oidc backchannel logout accepts unsigned forged logout tokens14Monitor
- CVE-2025-12150118 days apartOrg.keycloak/keycloak-services: webauthn attestation statement verification bypass12Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-90860 days apartKeycloak: keycloak: cross-site scripting (xss) via case-insensitive uri validation bypass29Monitor
- CVE-2026-90830 days apartKeycloak: keycloak: information disclosure through arbitrary filesystem path probing19Monitor
- CVE-2026-3798072 days apartOrg.keycloak.forms.login: keycloak: keycloak: arbitrary code execution via stored cross-site scripting (xss) in organization selection login page19Monitor
- CVE-2026-487491 days apartOrg.keycloak.protocol.oidc.grants: org.keycloak.services.managers: keycloak: server-side request forgery via oidc token endpoint manipulation12Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-26-0451 · Jun 29, 2026(Red Hat Keycloak Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-347 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic SignatureCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The verifier takes the algorithm to verify with from the token’s own header. Untrusted data ends up deciding its own verification rule.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-347 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);Fixed
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey, {
algorithms: ["RS256"],
issuer: "https://id.example.com",
audience: "portal",
});Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Exploit maturitynone → poc
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.