CVE-2026-11736: Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in some NETGEAR Nighthawk routers
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 7/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.76% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 55.8% of all records.
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability affects certain NETGEAR models allowing an authenticated admin user to make unauthorized modification to router software and functionality.
- Published
- Aug 11, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 8, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 55th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
7
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 7 / 40 · 1.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · NETGEAR
- 1.9
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:L/U:Amber
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| netgear | rax20 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax20_firmware |
| netgear | rax20 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax20 |
| netgear | rax35v2 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax35v2_firmware |
| netgear | rax35v2 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax35v2 |
| netgear | rax41 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax41_firmware |
| netgear | rax41 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax41 |
| netgear | rax41v2 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax41v2_firmware |
| netgear | rax41v2 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax41v2 |
| netgear | rax42 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax42_firmware |
| netgear | rax42 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax42 |
| netgear | rax42v2 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:netgear:rax42v2_firmware |
| netgear | rax42v2 | cpe:2.3:h:netgear:rax42v2 |
and 26 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- netgear rax20 firmwareall versions
- netgear rax35v2 firmwarebefore 1.0.16.132
- netgear rax41 firmwareall versions
- netgear rax41v2 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.28
- netgear rax42 firmwareall versions
- netgear rax42v2 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.28
- netgear rax43 firmwarebefore 1.0.16.132
- netgear rax43v2 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.28
- netgear rax45 firmwareall versions
- netgear rax49s firmwarebefore 1.1.4.28
- netgear rax50 firmwarebefore 1.0.16.132
- netgear rax50s firmwareall versions
- netgear rax50v2 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.28
- netgear rax54sv2 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.28
- netgear rax54v2 firmwarebefore 1.1.4.28
- netgear raxe450 firmwareall versions
- netgear raxe500 firmwarebefore 1.2.14.114
- netgear xr1000 firmwarebefore 1.1.0.22
- netgear xr1000v2 firmwarebefore 1.1.0.22
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (NETGEAR). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
NETGEAR RAX20
- all versionsaffected
NETGEAR RAX35v2
- before V1.0.16.132affected
NETGEAR RAX41
- all versionsaffected
NETGEAR RAX41v2
- before V1.1.4.28affected
NETGEAR RAX42
- all versionsaffected
NETGEAR RAX42v2
- before V1.1.4.28affected
NETGEAR RAX43
- before V1.0.16.132affected
NETGEAR RAX43v2
- before V1.1.4.28affected
NETGEAR RAX45
- all versionsaffected
NETGEAR RAX49S
- before V1.1.4.28affected
NETGEAR RAX50
- before V1.0.16.132affected
NETGEAR RAX50S
- all versionsaffected
Same product
netgear: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-11737Some NETGEAR Nighthawk devices allow administrators to tamper with the device17Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- SmallSfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-117370 days apartSome NETGEAR Nighthawk devices allow administrators to tamper with the device17Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:N/R:U/V:D/RE:L/U:Amber
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (18 more)Show less
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax20/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax35v2/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax41/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax41v2/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax42/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax42v2/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax43/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax43v2/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax45/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax49s/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax50/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax50s/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax50v2/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/rax54sv2/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/raxe450/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/raxe500/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/xr1000/
- www.netgear.com/support/product/xr1000v2/
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.