CVE-2026-111386: Nezha 1.7.0 before 2.3.15 Cross-Tenant Server-ID Enumeration via getServerConfig
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.21% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: nezhahq nezha 2.3.15.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to nezhahq nezha 2.3.15 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Nezha from 1.7.0 before 2.3.15 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows authenticated members to enumerate other tenants' server IDs through differential responses. Attackers can sweep sequential IDs against getServerConfig and setServerConfig, distinguishing 'permission denied' from success payloads to map other users' servers.
- Published
- Oct 16, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 16, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 11th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-204
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
nezhahq nezha
- 2.3.15not affected
- 1.7.0 and later · before 2.3.15affected · semver
Same product
nezhahq: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-62283Nezha Monitoring: Cross-tenant terminal/file-manager session hijack via WebSocket stream UUID without ownership check39Monitor
- CVE-2026-46716Nezha Monitoring: RoleMember can run shell on every server (cross-tenant RCE) via POST /api/v1/cron39Monitor
- CVE-2026-101090Nezha through 2.2.3 Host Header Injection via OAuth2 redirect_uri37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-111384Oct 16, 2026 · Nezha 1.0.0 before 2.3.15 Memory Exhaustion via File Manager WebSocket28Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-111385Oct 16, 2026 · Nezha 2.1.0 before 2.3.15 Host Header Injection via MCP Transfer Tools25Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-111387Oct 16, 2026 · Nezha 2.2.5 before 2.3.15 Information Disclosure via DDNS List Endpoint28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| nezhahq nezha | 2.3.15 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Fix recordedsame day
- Published
- TodayNov 13, 2026+29 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Tan-JunWeireporter
Not on record for this CVE: variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-204 · Observable Response DiscrepancyCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → poc
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.