CVE-2026-108607: JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 IDOR via deleteVideoRecord userId Parameter
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated users to delete other users' AI video generation records by supplying arbitrary userId values to DELETE /airag/video/deleteVideoRecord. Attackers can obtain record ids from the unchecked GET /airag/video/listByUser endpoint and delete victims' Redis-stored video history entries one record per request.
- Published
- Oct 10, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 18, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 15th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-639
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
jeecgboot JeecgBoot
- up to and including 3.9.5affected
Same product
jeecgboot: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-108657JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 Missing Authorization via /sys/tenant/passApply34Monitor
- CVE-2026-108628JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 Missing Authorization via saveDeptRolePermission Endpoint34Monitor
- CVE-2026-58377JeecgBoot 3.9.2 - Missing Authorization on OpenAPI Credential Management Endpoints Exposes Access/Secret Keys34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-108605Oct 10, 2026 · JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 Missing Authorization via /airag/ocr/edit Endpoint21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-108606Oct 10, 2026 · JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 Missing Authorization via /airag/ocr/deleteById21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-108608Oct 10, 2026 · JeecgBoot through 3.9.5 IDOR via deleteVoiceRecord userId Parameter21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Yaqi Chaofinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1086080 days apartJeecgBoot through 3.9.5 IDOR via deleteVoiceRecord userId Parameter21Monitor
- CVE-2026-1086090 days apartJeecgBoot through 3.9.5 IDOR via /airag/voice/listByUser userId Parameter21Monitor
- CVE-2026-1086410 days apartJeecgBoot through 3.9.5 IDOR via /sys/sysAnnouncementSend/getOne21Monitor
- CVE-2026-1086420 days apartJeecgBoot through 3.9.5 IDOR via PUT /sys/sysAnnouncementSend/edit21Monitor
- CVE-2026-1086720 days apartJeecgBoot through 3.9.5 Authorization Bypass via /airag/video/listByUser21Monitor
- CVE-2026-1088791 days apartJeecgBoot through 3.9.5 IDOR via /airag/api/getChatVariable Username Parameter21Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-639 · Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled KeyCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
The endpoint fetches the record by the ID sent in the request, but never checks whether the record belongs to the requesting user.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-639 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const invoice = await Invoice.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(invoice);Fixed
const invoice = await Invoice.findOne({
id: req.params.id,
ownerId: req.user.id,
});
if (!invoice) return res.sendStatus(404);
res.json(invoice);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (2)
- SSVC exploitation— → poc
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.