CVE-2026-106509: Backstage: Improper validation of MkDocs theme configuration in TechDocs
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 35/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.51% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node (npm) 1.15.4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node (npm) 1.15.4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Prior to 1.14.6, the @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node package is affected by improper validation of mkdocs theme configuration in techdocs. When TechDocs is configured to build documentation locally or in a container, a user with write access to a registered repository can include configuration values in mkdocs.yml that cause arbitrary code execution during the documentation build process. This issue is fixed in versions 1.14.6 and 1.15.4.
- Published
- Oct 6, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 9, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 44th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-94
Report tools
Action score
35
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 8.8
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.7
- 1.1 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| linuxfoundation | backstage plugin-techdocs-node | cpe:2.3:a:linuxfoundation:backstage_plugin-techdocs-node |
| linuxfoundation | backstage | cpe:2.3:a:linuxfoundation:backstage |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
@backstage plugin-techdocs-node
- < 1.14.6, >= 1.15.0, < 1.15.4affected
backstage backstage
- < 1.50.5, >= 1.51.0-next.0, < 1.54.6affected
Affected versions · NVD (5)
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- linuxfoundation backstagebefore 1.50.5
- linuxfoundation backstage1.51.1 and later · before 1.54.6
- linuxfoundation backstage1.51.0
- linuxfoundation backstage plugin-techdocs-nodebefore 1.14.6
- linuxfoundation backstage plugin-techdocs-node1.15.0 and later · before 1.15.4
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| npm | @backstage/plugin-techdocs-node | before 1.15.4 | 1.15.4 |
Same product
linuxfoundation: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-29186@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node: TechDocs Mkdocs Configuration Key Enables Arbitrary Code Execution39Monitor
- CVE-2026-106558Backstage: Improper validation of TechDocs MkDocs configuration35Monitor
- CVE-2026-88064Backstage: Improper input validation in TechDocs MkDocs configuration35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-106507Oct 6, 2026 · Backstage: TechDocs arbitrary file read via mkdocs snippets26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-106508Oct 6, 2026 · Backstage: Potential file exposure through local TechDocs publisher26Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-106510Oct 7, 2026 · Backstage: Remote code execution via crafted markdown_extensions in TechDocs mkdocs.yml30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| npm:@backstage/plugin-techdocs-node | 1.15.4 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recorded+1 d
- TodayNov 14, 2026+38 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-94 · Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
- CVSS7.7 → 8.8
- Fix✗ → ✓
- SSVC exploitation— → none
- Exploit maturity— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.