CVE-2026-104470: YesWiki before 4.6.7 SSRF via Bazar valeur Action url Parameter
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 21/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.24% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: YesWiki yeswiki 4.6.7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to YesWiki yeswiki 4.6.7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows page editors to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs via the url parameter of the Bazar valeur action. Attackers can embed the action with a champ parameter in wiki markup to reach loopback or internal services and partially read responses rendered into the page.
- Published
- Oct 2, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 4, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 15th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
21
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
YesWiki yeswiki
- 4.6.7not affected
- before 4.6.7affected · semver
Same product
yeswiki: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-46670YesWiki: Unauthenticated SQL Injection40Plan
- CVE-2018-1000641YesWiki version <= cercopitheque beta 1 contains a PHP Object Injection vulnerability in Unserialising user entered parameter in…40Plan
- CVE-2026-52778YesWiki has Unsafe eval() in Formula Calculator - Remote Code Execution (RCE) & Denial of Service (DoS)39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-104468Oct 2, 2026 · YesWiki before 4.6.7 Non-Expiring Password Reset Tokens via LostPasswordAction25Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-104469Oct 2, 2026 · YesWiki before 4.6.7 Session Fixation via Login in AuthController.php30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-104471Oct 2, 2026 · YesWiki before 4.6.7 Unrestricted File Upload via Bazar CSV Import34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| YesWiki yeswiki | 4.6.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- Fix recordedsame day
- TodayNov 13, 2026+42 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- sondt99reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-1044640 days apartYesWiki before 4.6.7 SSRF via Bazar abonnements sync actor parameter35Monitor
- CVE-2026-1044630 days apartYesWiki before 4.6.7 Unauthenticated SSRF via ActivityPub Inbox33Monitor
- CVE-2026-1044580 days apartYesWiki before 4.6.7 SSRF Guard Bypass via IPv6 Transition Addresses33Monitor
- CVE-2026-5276928 days apartYesWiki: Unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery via ActivityPub `Signature.keyId`33Monitor
- CVE-2026-11682625 days apartYesWiki before 4.7.0 Authenticated SSRF via Page Duplication API downloadFile32Monitor
- CVE-2026-11682725 days apartYesWiki before 4.7.0 SSRF via copyUrlToLocalFile in Bazar CSV Import32Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-1044450 days apartYesWiki before 4.6.7 Authentication Bypass via ActivityPub Inbox Actor Spoofing35Monitor
- CVE-2026-1044460 days apartYesWiki before 4.6.7 Unauthenticated Open Mail Relay via Contact Mail Handler27Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- SSVC exploitation— → poc
- Exploit maturity— → none
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.