Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE.org (no NVD analysis yet)· CNA VulnCheck

CVE-2026-103395: LightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Visual-Only RPyC Service

CriticalCVSS 9.3 · v4.0—No exploit No fix recorded

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 37/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.61% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50% of all records.
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

LightLLM through 1.2.0 visual_only deployments expose an unauthenticated RPyC service with allow_pickle enabled that deserializes attacker-supplied arguments in the remote_infer_images method. Attackers can reach the visual RPyC port and pass objects with __reduce__ methods to execute arbitrary code with service account privileges.

Published
Sep 30, 2026
Updated
Sep 30, 2026
EPSS
0.6% · 50th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

37

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
37 / 40 · 9.3 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.6%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
proof of concept
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · VulnCheck
9.3
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2026-103395

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits every 10 minutes on paid plans, on the hour on the free plan.

Your free account also gets you

  • CVE alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools, at most 30 a day (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for modeltc records
Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • ModelTC LightLLM

    • up to and including 1.2.0affected · semver

Same product

modeltc: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-103041LightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Embed Cache RPyC Service
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-103040LightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Router Profiler RPyC Service
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-96560LightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via NCCL PD RPyC Control Channel
    37Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-103243Sep 30, 2026 · LightLLM through 1.2.0 Server-Side Request Forgery via multimodal endpoints
    27Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2026-103270Sep 30, 2026 · LightLLM through 1.2.0 Missing Authentication on RL Control Routes
    34Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2026-111160Oct 15, 2026 · LightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated DoS via pd_kv_trans_params Deserialization
    34Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2026-1030401 days apartLightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Router Profiler RPyC Service
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-1030411 days apartLightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Embed Cache RPyC Service
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-965607 days apartLightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via NCCL PD RPyC Control Channel
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-9091916 days apartLightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Config Server Pickle Deserialization
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-26220226 days apartLightLLM <= 1.1.0 PD Mode Unsafe Deserialization RCE
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2026-11116015 days apartLightLLM through 1.2.0 Unauthenticated DoS via pd_kv_trans_params Deserialization
    34Monitor

Not on record for this CVE: patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-502 · Deserialization of Untrusted Data

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Root cause

Data received over the network is deserialized into the language’s native object format without verifying its source. Code paths inside the object can be triggered during deserialization.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-502 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

python
payload = sock.recv(65536)job = pickle.loads(payload)

Fixed

python
payload = sock.recv(65536)if not hmac.compare_digest(sign(payload), header_sig):    raise PermissionError("invalid signature")job = JobSchema.validate(json.loads(payload))

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

References

Show all references (4 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records