Obot before v0.23.0 Server-Side Request Forgery via MCP
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.24% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: obot-platform obot 0.23.0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to obot-platform obot 0.23.0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Obot before v0.23.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in remote MCP server registration that allows privileged users to specify arbitrary URLs without destination validation. Attackers with Power User or higher roles can coerce Obot to make requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, reading responses in error messages to disclose sensitive credentials.
- Published
- Sep 27, 2026
- Updated
- Sep 28, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 14th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-918
Report tools
Action score
33
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 33 / 40 · 8.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulnCheck
- 8.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulnCheck). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
obot-platform obot
- 0.23.0not affected
- before 0.23.0affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/obot-platform/obot | before 0.23.0 | 0.23.0 |
Same product
obot-platform: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-101084obot before v0.21.1 Authorization Bypass via /mcp-connect37Monitor
- CVE-2026-101065Obot Quickstart Docker Deployment Unauthenticated Admin Access37Monitor
- CVE-2026-114662Obot before 0.26.0 API Key Theft via CLI Login Token Request34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-101062Sep 27, 2026 · Obot before v0.23.0 Authentication Bypass via OAuth Dynamic Client Registration34Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-101063Sep 27, 2026 · Obot before v0.23.0 Authentication Bypass via Registry API27Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-103758Oct 1, 2026 · Obot 0.21.1 through 0.24.1 Authorization Bypass via /mcp-connect-composite/ Route34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| obot-platform obot | 0.23.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Go:github.com/obot-platform/obot | 0.23.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- hewei-gikakureporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
—
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2026-1010650 days apartObot Quickstart Docker Deployment Unauthenticated Admin Access37Monitor
- CVE-2026-1010620 days apartObot before v0.23.0 Authentication Bypass via OAuth Dynamic Client Registration34Monitor
- CVE-2026-11466225 days apartObot before 0.26.0 API Key Theft via CLI Login Token Request34Monitor
- CVE-2026-1010630 days apartObot before v0.23.0 Authentication Bypass via Registry API27Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-918 · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
- SSVC exploitation— → none
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.