TOTOLINK A702R formFilter sub_4162DC buffer overflow
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.66% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK A702R 4.0.0-B20211108.1423. Affected by this vulnerability is the function sub_4162DC of the file /boafrm/formFilter. The manipulation of the argument ip6addr results in buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.
- Published
- Sep 1, 2025
- Updated
- Sep 25, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 50th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
29
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 29 / 40 · 7.4 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulDB
- 8.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| totolink | a702r firmware | cpe:2.3:o:totolink:a702r_firmware |
| totolink | a702r | cpe:2.3:h:totolink:a702r |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- totolink a702r firmware4.0.0-b20211108.1423
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
TOTOLINK A702R
- 4.0.0-B20211108.1423affected
Same product
totolink: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-4835TOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formWlanRedirect buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4834TOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formSetLg buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4833TOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formNtp buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4832TOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formDosCfg buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4831TOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formSiteSurveyProfile buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4830TOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formSysCmd buffer overflow34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- rew1X (VulDB User)reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-4823107 days apartTOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formReflashClientTbl submit-url buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4826107 days apartTOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formWirelessTbl buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4827107 days apartTOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formSaveConfig buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4829107 days apartTOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formStats sub_40BE30 buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4830107 days apartTOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formSysCmd buffer overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-4833107 days apartTOTOLINK A702R/A3002R/A3002RU HTTP POST Request formNtp buffer overflow34Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (5 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.