Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM tabdetail_moduleSave.php sql injection
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 8/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.51% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM 8.6.5.4.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 5.3, NVD 2.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM 8.6.5.4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability was identified in Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM up to 8.6.4.7. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /crm/crmapi/erp/tabdetail_moduleSave.php. The manipulation of the argument getvaluestring leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. Upgrading to version 8.6.5.4 can resolve this issue. The affected component should be upgraded. The vendor explains: "All SQL injection vectors were patched via parameterized queries and input sanitization in v8.6.5+."
- Published
- Aug 19, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 42th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-74
Report tools
Action score
8
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 8 / 40 · 2.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulDB
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| 51mis | lingdang crm | cpe:2.3:a:51mis:lingdang_crm |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- 51mis lingdang crmbefore 8.6.5.4
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM
- 8.6.5.4not affected
- 8.6.4.0, 8.6.4.1, 8.6.4.2, 8.6.4.3, 8.6.4.4, 8.6.4.5, 8.6.4.6, 8.6.4.7affected
Same product
51mis: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-5005Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM index_event.php server-side request forgery22Monitor
- CVE-2025-8219Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM HTTP POST Request tabdetail_moduleSave_dxkp.php sql injection21Monitor
- CVE-2025-0463Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM index.php unrestricted upload21Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-0462Jan 14, 2025 · Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM index.php sql injection21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-8345Jul 30, 2025 · Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM yunzhijiaApi.php delete_user sql injection8Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-8908Aug 13, 2025 · Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM event.php sql injection8Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM | 8.6.5.4 · description | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | webapps | 2025-08-26 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+7 d
- TodayOct 21, 2026+428 d
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-821924 days apartShanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM HTTP POST Request tabdetail_moduleSave_dxkp.php sql injection21Monitor
- CVE-2025-0462217 days apartShanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM index.php sql injection21Monitor
- CVE-2024-11121280 days apart上海灵当信息科技有限公司 Lingdang CRM index.php sql injection21Monitor
- CVE-2025-89086 days apartShanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM event.php sql injection8Monitor
- CVE-2025-834520 days apartShanghai Lingdang Information Technology Lingdang CRM yunzhijiaApi.php delete_user sql injection8Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-74 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- HTTP Request SplittingCAPEC-105likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
- Format String InjectionCAPEC-135likelihood: High · High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (4 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.