CVE-2025-8291: ZIP64 End of Central Directory (EOCD) Locator record offset not checked
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.46% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Python Software Foundation CPython 3.10.19, 3.11.14, 3.12.12; azl3 python3 3.12.9-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.12.9-5; azl3 python3 3.12.9-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.12.9-5.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Python Software Foundation CPython 3.10.19, 3.11.14, 3.12.12; azl3 python3 3.12.9-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.12.9-5; azl3 python3 3.12.9-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.12.9-5 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The 'zipfile' module would not check the validity of the ZIP64 End of Central Directory (EOCD) Locator record offset value would not be used to locate the ZIP64 EOCD record, instead the ZIP64 EOCD record would be assumed to be the previous record in the ZIP archive. This could be abused to create ZIP archives that are handled differently by the 'zipfile' module compared to other ZIP implementations. Remediation maintains this behavior, but checks that the offset specified in the ZIP64 EOCD Locator record matches the expected value.
- BDU:2026-00313
- ALSA-2025:23323
- ALSA-2025:23342
- ALSA-2025:23530
- ALSA-2025:23940
- ALSA-2026:0123
- DLA-4354-1
- DLA-4445-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15742-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15748-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15750-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15760-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15768-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15792-1
- openSUSE-SU-2026:20081-1
- RHSA-2025:23323
- RHSA-2025:23342
- RHSA-2025:23530
- RHSA-2025:23940
- RHSA-2026:0123
- Published
- Oct 7, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 8, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 40th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-1285
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · PSF
- 4.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (PSF). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Python Software Foundation CPython
- before 3.9.24affected · python
- 3.10.0 and later · before 3.10.19affected · python
- 3.11.0 and later · before 3.11.14affected · python
- 3.12.0 and later · before 3.12.12affected · python
- 3.13.0 and later · before 3.13.10affected · python
- 3.14.0 and later · before 3.14.1affected · python
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | python-unversioned-command | before 3.12.12-1.el10_1 | 3.12.12-1.el10_1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3.12 | before 3.12.12-1.el8_10 | 3.12.12-1.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3.12-debug | before 3.12.12-1.el8_10 | 3.12.12-1.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3.12-devel | before 3.12.12-1.el8_10 | 3.12.12-1.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3.12-idle | before 3.12.12-1.el8_10 | 3.12.12-1.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3.12-libs | before 3.12.12-1.el8_10 | 3.12.12-1.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3.12-rpm-macros | before 3.12.12-1.el8_10 | 3.12.12-1.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3.12-test | before 3.12.12-1.el8_10 | 3.12.12-1.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3.12-tkinter | before 3.12.12-1.el8_10 | 3.12.12-1.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39 | before 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb | 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-attrs | before 20.3.0-2.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 | 20.3.0-2.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-cffi | before 1.14.3-2.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 | 1.14.3-2.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-cffi | before 1.14.3-2.module_el8.6.0+3248+c431e88c | 1.14.3-2.module_el8.6.0+3248+c431e88c |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-chardet | before 3.0.4-19.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 | 3.0.4-19.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-cryptography | before 3.3.1-3.module_el8.10.0+3765+2f9a457d | 3.3.1-3.module_el8.10.0+3765+2f9a457d |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-Cython | before 0.29.21-5.module_el8.6.0+3248+c431e88c | 0.29.21-5.module_el8.6.0+3248+c431e88c |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-Cython | before 0.29.21-5.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 | 0.29.21-5.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-debug | before 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb | 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-devel | before 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb | 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-idle | before 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb | 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-idna | before 2.10-4.module_el8.10.0+3849+a48d89aa | 2.10-4.module_el8.10.0+3849+a48d89aa |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-iniconfig | before 1.1.1-2.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 | 1.1.1-2.module_el8.6.0+2780+a40f65e1 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-libs | before 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb | 3.9.25-2.module_el8.10.0+4083+53cad1fb |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python39-lxml | before 4.6.5-1.module_el8.6.0+3248+c431e88c | 4.6.5-1.module_el8.6.0+3248+c431e88c |
+96
Same product
python software foundation: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-115557Distrust compromised intermediate certificates in ssl module37Monitor
- CVE-2025-4517Arbitrary writes via tarfile realpath overflow37Monitor
- CVE-2026-19445Use-after-free of a server-side SSLContext when sni_callback switches contexts36Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-6069Jun 17, 2025 · HTMLParser quadratic complexity when processing malformed inputs17Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-8194Jul 28, 2025 · Tarfile infinite loop during parsing with negative member offset30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-11468Jan 20, 2026 · Folding email comments of unfoldable characters doesn't preserve parenthesis22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Python Software Foundation CPython | 3.10.19 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Python Software Foundation CPython | 3.11.14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Python Software Foundation CPython | 3.12.12 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Python Software Foundation CPython | 3.13.10 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Python Software Foundation CPython | 3.14.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Python Software Foundation CPython | 3.9.24 | Vendor (CNA) |
| azl3 python3 3.12.9-4 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.12.9-5 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 python3 3.12.9-5 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 3.12.9-5 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 python3 3.9.19-15 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 3.9.19-16 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 python3 3.9.19-16 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 3.9.19-16 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| almalinux:python-unversioned-command | 3.9.25-2.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3 | 3.9.25-2.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3-debug | 3.9.25-2.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3-devel | 3.9.25-2.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3-idle | 3.9.25-2.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3.12 | 3.12.12-1.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3.12-debug | 3.12.12-1.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3.12-devel | 3.12.12-1.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3.12-idle | 3.12.12-1.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3.12-libs | 3.12.12-1.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3.12-test | 3.12.12-1.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3.12-tkinter | 3.12.12-1.el9_7 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:pypy3 | 7.3.21+dfsg-1 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:python3.11 | 3.11.2-6+deb12u7 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:python3.13 | 3.13.5-2+deb13u1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:python3.14 | 3.14.0-3 · Debian:14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:python3.9 | 3.9.2-1+deb11u4 · Debian:11 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python | 2.7.18-150000.86.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-base | 2.7.18-150000.86.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-doc | 2.7.18-150000.86.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
+47
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Caleb Brown (Google)reporter
- Serhiy Storchakaremediation developer
- Seth Larsoncoordinator
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-1285 · Improper Validation of Specified Index, Position, or Offset in InputCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (11 more)Show less
- github.com/python/cpython/commit/1d29afb0d6218aa8fb5e1e4a6133a4778d89bb46
- github.com/python/cpython/commit/333d4a6f4967d3ace91492a39ededbcf3faa76a6
- github.com/python/cpython/commit/76437ac248ad8ca44e9bf697b02b1e2241df2196
- github.com/python/cpython/commit/8392b2f0d35678407d9ce7d95655a5b77de161b4
- github.com/python/cpython/commit/bca11ae7d575d87ed93f5dd6a313be6246e3e388
- github.com/python/cpython/commit/d11e69d6203080e3ec450446bfed0516727b85c3
- github.com/python/cpython/issues/139700
- github.com/python/cpython/pull/139702
- mail.python.org/archives/list/security-announce@python.org/thread/QECOPWMTH4VPPJAXAH2BGTA4XADOP62G/
- github.com/google/security-research/security/advisories/GHSA-hhv7-p4pg-wm6p
- github.com/psf/advisory-database/blob/main/advisories/python/PSF-2025-12.json
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.