CVE-2025-68161: Apache Log4j Core: Missing TLS hostname verification in Socket appender
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.76% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 55.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: Apache Software Foundation Apache Log4j Core 2.25.3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Apache Software Foundation Apache Log4j Core 2.25.3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The Socket Appender in Apache Log4j Core versions 2.0-beta9 through 2.25.2 does not perform TLS hostname verification of the peer certificate, even when the verifyHostName https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders/network.html#SslConfiguration-attr-verifyHostName configuration attribute or the log4j2.sslVerifyHostName https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/systemproperties.html#log4j2.sslVerifyHostName system property is set to true. This issue may allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to intercept or redirect log traffic under the following conditions: * The attacker is able to intercept or redirect network traffic between the client and the log receiver. * The attacker can present a server certificate issued by a certification authority trusted by the Socket Appender’s configured trust store (or by the default Java trust store if no custom trust store is configured). Users are advised to upgrade to Apache Log4j Core version 2.25.3, which addresses this issue. As an alternative mitigation, the Socket Appender may be configured to use a private or restricted trust root to limit the set of trusted certificates.
- Published
- Dec 18, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 55th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-297
Report tools
Action score
25
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · apache
- 6.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| apache | log4j | cpe:2.3:a:apache:log4j |
Check your site's encryption
This vulnerability is about certificate validation or weak cryptography. The free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers.
Run the SSL checkAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- apache log4j2.0.1 and later · before 2.25.3
- apache log4j2.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (apache). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Apache Software Foundation Apache Log4j Core
- 2.0-beta9 and later · before 2.25.3affected · maven
- 3.0.0-alpha1 and later · up to and including 3.0.0-beta3affected · maven
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | apache-log4j2 | before 2.17.1-1~deb11u2 | 2.17.1-1~deb11u2 |
| Debian:12 | apache-log4j2 | from 0 | — |
| Maven | org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core | from 2.0-beta9 · before 2.25.3 | 2.25.3 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | log4j | before 2.20.0-150200.4.30.1 | 2.20.0-150200.4.30.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | coredns | before 1.14.0-bp160.1.1 | 1.14.0-bp160.1.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | log4j | before 2.20.0-1.1 | 2.20.0-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | log4j | before 2.20.0-150200.4.30.1 | 2.20.0-150200.4.30.1 |
Same product
apache: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-44228Apache Log4j2 JNDI features do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpointsKEV100Now
- CVE-2021-45046Apache Log4j2 Thread Context Message Pattern and Context Lookup Pattern vulnerable to a denial of service attackKEV96Now
- CVE-2017-5645In Apache Log4j 2.x before 2.8.2, when using the TCP socket server or UDP socket server to receive serialized log events from another applic66This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-23305Jan 18, 2022 · SQL injection in JDBC Appender in Apache Log4j V159Plan
- ← EarlierCVE-2023-26464Mar 10, 2023 · Apache Log4j 1.x (EOL) allows DoS in Chainsaw and SocketAppender31Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-34477Apr 10, 2026 · Apache Log4j Core: verifyHostName attribute silently ignored in TLS configuration, allowing hostname verification bypass25Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Apache Software Foundation Apache Log4j Core | 2.25.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:apache-log4j2 | 2.17.1-1~deb11u2 · Debian:11 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Maven:org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-core | 2.25.3 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:coredns | 1.14.0-bp160.1.1 · openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:log4j | 2.20.0-150200.4.30.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:log4j | 2.20.0-150200.4.30.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Samuli Leinonenfinder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-34477113 days apartApache Log4j Core: verifyHostName attribute silently ignored in TLS configuration, allowing hostname verification bypass25Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-297 · Improper Validation of Certificate with Host MismatchCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (6 more)Show less
- lists.apache.org/thread/xr33kyxq3sl67lwb61ggvm1fzc8k7dvx
- logging.apache.org/cyclonedx/vdr.xml
- logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/appenders/network.html#SslConfiguration-attr-verifyHostName
- logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/systemproperties.html#log4j2.sslVerifyHostName
- www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/12/18/1
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2026/01/msg00015.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.