Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2025-64488· NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

SuiteCRM: Authenticated SQL Injection Possible in Reschedule Call Module

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.46% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
  • No fixed version is recorded, but the references include a patch (commit or PR) link.

Low priority for now. See the fix and affected versions sections below.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

SuiteCRM is an open-source, enterprise-ready Customer Relationship Management (CRM) software application. In versions 7.14.7 and below and 8.0.0-beta.1 through 8.9.0 8.0.0-beta.1, an attacker can craft a malicious call_id that alters the logic of the SQL query or injects arbitrary SQL. An attack can lead to unauthorized data access and data ex-filtration, complete database compromise, and other various issues. This issue is fixed in versions 7.14.8 and 8.9.1.

HighCVSS 8.6 · v4.0—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Nov 7, 2025
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.4% · 38th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

34

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
34 / 40 · 8.6 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.4%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
8.6
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2025-64488

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Don't want an account? Get "Exploited this week" by email every MondayDon't want an account? RSS feed for salesagility records

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
salesagilitysuitecrm

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • salesagility suitecrmbefore 7.14.8
  • salesagility suitecrm8.0.0 and later · up to 8.9.0 inclusive

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • SuiteCRM SuiteCRM

    • >= 8.0.0-beta.1, < 8.9.1, < 7.14.8affected

Same product

salesagility: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2020-28328SuiteCRM before 7.11.17 is vulnerable to remote code execution via the system settings Log File Name setting.
    54Plan
  • CVE-2021-42840SuiteCRM before 7.11.19 allows remote code execution via the system settings Log File Name setting.
    53Plan
  • CVE-2022-23940SuiteCRM through 7.12.1 and 8.x through 8.0.1 allows Remote Code Execution.
    51Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2022-50589Nov 6, 2025 · SuiteCRM < 7.12.6 SQL Injection via 'export' Functionality
    37Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2022-50590Nov 6, 2025 · SuiteCRM < 7.12.6 Type Confusion via 'deleteAttachment' Functionality
    35Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2025-64489Nov 7, 2025 · SuiteCRM: Privilege Escalation via Improper Session Invalidation and Inactive User Bypass
    35Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2024-36412515 days apartSuiteCRM unauthenticated SQL Injection
    41Plan
  • CVE-2022-505891 days apartSuiteCRM < 7.12.6 SQL Injection via 'export' Functionality
    37Monitor
  • CVE-2025-644920 days apartSuiteCRM is Vulnerable to Authenticated Time Based Blind SQL Injection
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2025-5478893 days apartSuiteCRM: Authenticated Blind SQL Injection in InboundEmail module
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2024-49772367 days apartAuthenticated SQL injection in AM_ProjectTemplates controller in SuiteCRM
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2024-50332367 days apartAuthenticated Blind SQL Injection in DeleteRelationShip in SuiteCRM
    35Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

  • CVE-2025-5478693 days apartSuiteCRM: Legacy iCal service allows unauthenticated access to meeting data
    21Monitor

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
Integrity
Availability
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
X

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-89 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

CVSS vector

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The query text is built by concatenating user input. The database cannot tell where the data ends and the command begins.

The bug in code

The whole CWE-89 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const owner = req.query.owner;const rows = await db.query(  "SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = '" + owner + "'");

Fixed

ts
const owner = req.query.owner;const rows = await db.query(  "SELECT * FROM files WHERE owner = $1",  [owner]);

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Show all references (2 more)

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records