CVE-2025-59969: Junos OS Evolved: QFX5000 Series and PTX Series: An attacker sending crafted multicast packets will cause evo-aftmand / evo-pfemand to crash and restart
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.18% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 22.2R3-S7-EVO, 22.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.4R3-S8-EVO.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved 22.2R3-S7-EVO, 22.4R3-S7-EVO, 22.4R3-S8-EVO or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') vulnerability in the advanced forwarding toolkit (evo-aftmand/evo-pfemand) of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved on PTX Series or QFX5000 Series allows an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).An attacker sending crafted multicast packets will cause line cards running evo-aftmand/evo-pfemand to crash and restart or non-line card devices to crash and restart. Continued receipt and processing of these packets will sustain the Denial of Service (DoS) condition. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved PTX Series: * All versions before 22.4R3-S8-EVO, * from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S5-EVO, * from 23.4 before 23.4R2-EVO, * from 24.2 before 24.2R2-EVO, * from 24.4 before 24.4R2-EVO. This issue affects Junos OS Evolved on QFX5000 Series: * 22.2-EVO version before 22.2R3-S7-EVO, * 22.4-EVO version before 22.4R3-S7-EVO, * 23.2-EVO versions before 23.2R2-S4-EVO, * 23.4-EVO versions before 23.4R2-S5-EVO, * 24.2-EVO versions before 24.2R2-S1-EVO, * 24.4-EVO versions before 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO. This issue does not affect Junos OS Evolved on QFX5000 Series versions before: 21.2R2-S1-EVO, 21.2R3-EVO, 21.3R2-EVO, 21.4R1-EVO, and 22.1R1-EVO.
- Published
- Apr 9, 2026
- Updated
- Oct 7, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 8th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-120
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · juniper
- 6.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| juniper | junos os evolved | cpe:2.3:o:juniper:junos_os_evolved |
| juniper | ptx10001-36mr | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:ptx10001-36mr |
| juniper | ptx10002-36qdd | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:ptx10002-36qdd |
| juniper | ptx10003 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:ptx10003 |
| juniper | ptx10004 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:ptx10004 |
| juniper | ptx10008 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:ptx10008 |
| juniper | ptx10016 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:ptx10016 |
| juniper | ptx12008 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:ptx12008 |
| juniper | qfx5110 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:qfx5110 |
| juniper | qfx5120 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:qfx5120 |
| juniper | qfx5130 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:qfx5130 |
| juniper | qfx5200 | cpe:2.3:h:juniper:qfx5200 |
and 6 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- juniper junos os evolvedbefore 22.4
- juniper junos os evolved22.2
- juniper junos os evolved22.4
- juniper junos os evolved23.2
- juniper junos os evolved23.4
- juniper junos os evolved24.2
- juniper junos os evolved24.4
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (juniper). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved
- before 22.4R3-S8-EVOaffected · semver
- 23.2 and later · before 23.2R2-S5-EVOaffected · semver
- 23.4 and later · before 23.4R2-EVOaffected · semver
- 24.2 and later · before 24.2R2-EVOaffected · semver
- 24.4 and later · before 24.4R2-EVOaffected · semver
- 22.2 and later · before 22.2R3-S7-EVOaffected · semver
- 22.4 and later · before 22.4R3-S7-EVOaffected · semver
- 23.2 and later · before 23.2R2-S4-EVOaffected · semver
- 23.4 and later · before 23.4R2-S5-EVOaffected · semver
- 24.2 and later · before 24.2R2-S1-EVOaffected · semver
Same product
juniper: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-21902Junos OS Evolved: PTX Series: A vulnerability allows a unauthenticated, network-based attacker to execute code as root43Plan
- CVE-2026-101990Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: A BGP peer causes an rpd crash when flow-spec routes are re-advertised37Monitor
- CVE-2026-101986Junos OS and Junos OS Evolved: J-Web permits pre-authentication CGI execution37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-60006Oct 9, 2025 · Junos OS Evolved: OS command injection vulnerabilities fixed19Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2026-21911Jan 15, 2026 · Junos OS Evolved: Flapping management interface causes MAC learning on label-switched interfaces to stop28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-33783Apr 9, 2026 · Junos OS Evolved: PTX Series: If SRTE tunnels provisioned via PCEP are present and specific gRPC queries are received evo-aftmand crashes28Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 22.2R3-S7-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 22.4R3-S7-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 22.4R3-S8-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 23.2R2-S4-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 23.2R2-S5-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 23.4R2-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 23.4R2-S5-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 24.2R2-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 24.2R2-S1-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 24.4R1-S3-EVO, 24.4R2-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
| Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved | 24.4R2-EVO | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-120 · Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:U/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber
nvd-secondary
Root cause
When data is copied, the source length is not compared with the size of the destination buffer. Excess data overwrites adjacent memory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-120 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
char buf[256];
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Fixed
char buf[256];
if (pkt->len > sizeof(buf)) {
return -EINVAL;
}
memcpy(buf, pkt->data, pkt->len);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Variables and TagsCAPEC-46likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.