CVE-2025-5994: Cache poisoning via the ECS-enabled Rebirthday Attack
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 34/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.21% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: NLnet Labs Unbound 1.23.0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to NLnet Labs Unbound 1.23.0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A multi-vendor cache poisoning vulnerability named 'Rebirthday Attack' has been discovered in caching resolvers that support EDNS Client Subnet (ECS). Unbound is also vulnerable when compiled with ECS support, i.e., '--enable-subnet', AND configured to send ECS information along with queries to upstream name servers, i.e., at least one of the 'send-client-subnet', 'client-subnet-zone' or 'client-subnet-always-forward' options is used. Resolvers supporting ECS need to segregate outgoing queries to accommodate for different outgoing ECS information. This re-opens up resolvers to a birthday paradox attack (Rebirthday Attack) that tries to match the DNS transaction ID in order to cache non-ECS poisonous replies.
- BDU:2025-12600
- ALSA-2025:11849
- ALSA-2025:11884
- ALSA-2025:12064
- DLA-4280-1
- DSA-5987-1
- openSUSE-SU-2025:15435-1
- RHSA-2025:11849
- RHSA-2025:11884
- RHSA-2025:12064
- RHSA-2025:12416
- RHSA-2025:12520
- RHSA-2025:12523
- RHSA-2025:12929
- RHSA-2025:13575
- RHSA-2025:13576
- RHSA-2025:13577
- RLSA-2025:11849
- RLSA-2025:11884
- Published
- Jul 16, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 12th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-349
Report tools
Action score
34
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · NLnet Labs
- 8.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/R:U/V:C
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (NLnet Labs). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
NLnet Labs Unbound
- 1.6.2 and later · before 1.23.0affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:10 | python3-unbound | before 1.20.0-12.el10_0 | 1.20.0-12.el10_0 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound | before 1.20.0-12.el10_0 | 1.20.0-12.el10_0 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-anchor | before 1.20.0-12.el10_0 | 1.20.0-12.el10_0 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-devel | before 1.20.0-12.el10_0 | 1.20.0-12.el10_0 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-dracut | before 1.20.0-12.el10_0 | 1.20.0-12.el10_0 |
| AlmaLinux:10 | unbound-libs | before 1.20.0-12.el10_0 | 1.20.0-12.el10_0 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3-unbound | before 1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | unbound | before 1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | unbound-devel | before 1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:8 | unbound-libs | before 1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 | 1.16.2-5.9.el8_10 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | python3-unbound | before 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | unbound | before 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | unbound-devel | before 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | unbound-dracut | before 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | unbound-libs | before 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 |
| Alpine:v3.19 | unbound | before 1.20.0-r2 | 1.20.0-r2 |
| Alpine:v3.21 | unbound | before 1.22.0-r1 | 1.22.0-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.22 | unbound | before 1.23.1-r0 | 1.23.1-r0 |
| Debian:11 | unbound | before 1.13.1-1+deb11u5 | 1.13.1-1+deb11u5 |
| Debian:12 | unbound | before 1.17.1-2+deb12u3 | 1.17.1-2+deb12u3 |
| Debian:13 | unbound | before 1.22.0-2 | 1.22.0-2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | unbound | before 1.23.1-1.1 | 1.23.1-1.1 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | python3-unbound | before 0:1.20.0-12.el10_0 | 0:1.20.0-12.el10_0 |
| Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | python3-unbound-debuginfo | before 0:1.20.0-12.el10_0 | 0:1.20.0-12.el10_0 |
+83
Same product
nlnet labs: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-97206DNS-over-QUIC (DoQ) path-migration can lead to use-after-free on multi-threaded deployments.30Monitor
- CVE-2026-50106Possible insecure NXDOMAIN for non-existing records under a configured island trust anchor underneath an insecure parent.26Monitor
- CVE-2026-14586Assertion in libngtcp2 when under pressure in high concurrency DNS-over-QUIC environments23Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- Later →CVE-2025-11411Oct 22, 2025 · Possible domain hijacking via promiscuous records in the authority section22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-109125Oct 21, 2026 · Possible cache poisoning vulnerability via a cache side-channel exposed by 'unwanted-reply-threshold'21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2026-35501Oct 21, 2026 · Bypass of a configured island trust anchor underneath an insecure parent from an atacker-controlled NSEC record.14Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| NLnet Labs Unbound | 1.23.0 | Vendor (CNA) |
| almalinux:python3-unbound | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-anchor | 1.20.0-12.el10_0 · AlmaLinux:10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-devel | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-dracut | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:unbound-libs | 1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| alpine:unbound | 1.20.0-r2 · Alpine:v3.19 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:unbound | 1.17.1-2+deb12u3 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:unbound | 1.23.1-1.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-unbound | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-unbound-debuginfo | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-anchor | 0:1.20.0-12.el10_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-anchor-debuginfo | 0:1.20.0-12.el10_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-debuginfo | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-debugsource | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-devel | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::crb | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-dracut | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-libs | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-libs-debuginfo | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:unbound-utils-debuginfo | 0:1.20.0-12.el10_0 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:unbound | 0:1.16.2-19.el9_6.1 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-1141198 days apartPossible domain hijacking via promiscuous records in the authority section22Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-349 · Acceptance of Extraneous Untrusted Data With Trusted DataCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:U/V:C/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.