CVE-2025-58246: WordPress <= 6.8.2 - (Contributor+) Sensitive Data Exposure Vulnerability
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.27% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: WordPress WordPress 4.7.31, 4.8.27, 4.9.28.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to WordPress WordPress 4.7.31, 4.8.27, 4.9.28 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in WordPress allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. The WordPress Core security team is aware of the issue and is already working on a fix. This is a low-severity vulnerability. Contributor-level privileges required in order to exploit it. This issue affects WordPress: from 6.8 through 6.8.2, from 6.7 through 6.7.3, from 6.6 through 6.6.3, from 6.5 through 6.5.6, from 6.4 through 6.4.6, from 6.3 through 6.3.6, from 6.2 through 6.2.7, from 6.1 through 6.1.8, from 6.0 through 6.0.10, from 5.9 through 5.9.11, from 5.8 through 5.8.11, from 5.7 through 5.7.13, from 5.6 through 5.6.15, from 5.5 through 5.5.16, from 5.4 through 5.4.17, from 5.3 through 5.3.19, from 5.2 through 5.2.22, from 5.1 through 5.1.20, from 5.0 through 5.0.23, from 4.9 through 4.9.27, from 4.8 through 4.8.26, from 4.7 through 4.7.30.
- Published
- Sep 23, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 19, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 19th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-201
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · Patchstack
- 4.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Is WordPress on your site?
WP Lens reads your site's plugin, theme and WordPress versions from the outside and matches them to known vulnerabilities. Works without an account.
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Using wordpress? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (WordPress)
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (Patchstack). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
WordPress WordPress
- 6.8 and later · up to and including 6.8.2affectedfixed in 6.8.3
- 6.7 and later · up to and including 6.7.3affectedfixed in 6.7.4
- 6.6 and later · up to and including 6.6.3affectedfixed in 6.6.4
- 6.5 and later · up to and including 6.5.6affectedfixed in 6.5.7
- 6.4 and later · up to and including 6.4.6affectedfixed in 6.4.7
- 6.3 and later · up to and including 6.3.6affectedfixed in 6.3.7
- 6.2 and later · up to and including 6.2.7affectedfixed in 6.2.8
- 6.1 and later · up to and including 6.1.8affectedfixed in 6.1.9
- 6.0 and later · up to and including 6.0.10affectedfixed in 6.0.11
- 5.9 and later · up to and including 5.9.11affectedfixed in 5.9.12
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | wordpress | before 5.7.14+dfsg1-0+deb11u1 | 5.7.14+dfsg1-0+deb11u1 |
| Debian:12 | wordpress | before 6.1.9+dfsg1-0+deb12u1 | 6.1.9+dfsg1-0+deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | wordpress | before 6.8.3+dfsg1-0+deb13u1 | 6.8.3+dfsg1-0+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | wordpress | before 6.8.3+dfsg1-1 | 6.8.3+dfsg1-1 |
Same product
wordpress: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-87902An unauthenticated attacker can make `get_page_template()` page-template resolution include a chosen readable local `.php` file outside the KEV91Now
- CVE-2026-63030WordPress < 7.0.2 - REST API batch-route confusion and SQL injection issue leading to Remote Code ExecutionKEV72This week
- CVE-2026-119977WordPress Core 4.7.0 - 7.1.3 - Unauthenticated Upgrade-Window Staged-Installer Remote Code ExecutionKEV62This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-4973Oct 16, 2024 · WordPress Core < 6.0.2 - Authenticated (Contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting via use of the_meta(); function21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-54352Jul 21, 2025 · WordPress 3.5 through 6.8.2 allows remote attackers to guess titles of private and draft posts via pingback.ping XML-RPC requests.14Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-58674Sep 23, 2025 · WordPress <= 6.8.2 - (Author+) Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability23Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| WordPress WordPress | 4.7.31 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 4.8.27 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 4.9.28 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.0.24 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.1.21 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.2.23 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.3.20 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.4.18 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.5.17 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.6.16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.7.14 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.8.12 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 5.9.12 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.0.11 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.1.9 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.2.8 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.3.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.4.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.5.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.6.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.7.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
| WordPress WordPress | 6.8.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| debian:wordpress | 6.1.9+dfsg1-0+deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- John Blackbourn (WordPress core security team lead)coordinator
- Timothy Jacobsreporter
- Peter Wilsonreporter
- Mike Nelsonreporter
- Abu Hurayra (Patchstack Bug Bounty Program)finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-201 · Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent DataCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Choosing Message IdentifierCAPEC-12likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Incorrectly Configured SSL/TLSCAPEC-217likelihood: Low
- WiFi MAC Address TrackingCAPEC-612Low
- WiFi SSID TrackingCAPEC-613Low
- Cellular Broadcast Message RequestCAPEC-618Low
- Signal Strength TrackingCAPEC-619Low
- Analysis of Packet Timing and SizesCAPEC-621Low
- Electromagnetic Side-Channel AttackCAPEC-622Low
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.