CVE-2025-5054: Race Condition in Canonical Apport
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.78% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 56% of all records.
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: Canonical Apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.30+esm5, 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.28, 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.7.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Canonical Apport 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.30+esm5, 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.28, 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.7 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Race condition in Canonical apport up to and including 2.32.0 allows a local attacker to leak sensitive information via PID-reuse by leveraging namespaces. When handling a crash, the function `_check_global_pid_and_forward`, which detects if the crashing process resided in a container, was being called before `consistency_checks`, which attempts to detect if the crashing process had been replaced. Because of this, if a process crashed and was quickly replaced with a containerized one, apport could be made to forward the core dump to the container, potentially leaking sensitive information. `consistency_checks` is now being called before `_check_global_pid_and_forward`. Additionally, given that the PID-reuse race condition cannot be reliably detected from userspace alone, crashes are only forwarded to containers if the kernel provided a pidfd, or if the crashing process was unprivileged (i.e., if dump mode == 1).
- Published
- May 30, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 56th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-362
Report tools
Action score
18
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 18 / 40 · 4.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · canonical
- 4.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| canonical | apport | cpe:2.3:a:canonical:apport |
| canonical | ubuntu linux | cpe:2.3:o:canonical:ubuntu_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- canonical apportup to 2.32.0 inclusive
- canonical ubuntu linux16.04
- canonical ubuntu linux18.04
- canonical ubuntu linux20.04
- canonical ubuntu linux22.04
- canonical ubuntu linux24.04
- canonical ubuntu linux24.10
- canonical ubuntu linux25.04
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (canonical). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Canonical Apport
- 2.20.1 and later · before 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.30+esm5affected · dpkg
- 2.20.9 and later · before 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.29+esm1affected · dpkg
- 2.20.11 and later · before 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.28affected · dpkg
- 2.20.11 and later · before 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.7affected · dpkg
- 2.28.1 and later · before 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.6affected · dpkg
- 2.30.0 and later · before 2.30.0-0ubuntu4.3affected · dpkg
- 2.32.0 and later · before 2.32.0-0ubuntu5.1affected · dpkg
- 2.32.0 and later · before 2.33.0-0ubuntu1affected · dpkg
- 2.20 and later · up to and including 2.32.0affected · semver
Same product
canonical: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-1242Apport can be tricked into connecting to arbitrary sockets as the root user31Monitor
- CVE-2021-3899There is a race condition in the 'replaced executable' detection that, with the correct local configuration, allow an attacker to execute ar31Monitor
- CVE-2023-1326local privilege escalation in apport-cli31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2022-28653Jan 30, 2025 · Users can consume unlimited disk space in /var/crash30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2020-11936Jan 30, 2025 · gdbus setgid privilege escalation12Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-5467Dec 10, 2025 · Ubuntu Apport Insecure File Permissions Vulnerability7Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Canonical Apport | 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.30+esm5 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical Apport | 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.28 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical Apport | 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.7 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical Apport | 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.29+esm1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical Apport | 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical Apport | 2.30.0-0ubuntu4.3 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical Apport | 2.32.0-0ubuntu5.1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Canonical Apport | 2.33.0-0ubuntu1 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2025-06-06 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+6 d
- TodayNov 4, 2026+523 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.