An issue in Ollama v0.1.33 allows attackers to delete arbitrary files via sending a crafted packet to the endpoint /api/pull.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 26/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.18% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: github.com/ollama/ollama (Go) 0.1.34; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.0.20250811T192933-1.1; govulncheck-vulndb (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6) 0.0.20250814T182633-150000.1.98.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to github.com/ollama/ollama (Go) 0.1.34; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.0.20250811T192933-1.1; govulncheck-vulndb (SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6) 0.0.20250814T182633-150000.1.98.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
- Published
- Aug 7, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 7th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
26
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 26 / 40 · 6.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| ollama | ollama | cpe:2.3:a:ollama:ollama |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- ollama ollama0.1.33
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/ollama/ollama | before 0.1.34 | 0.1.34 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20250811T192933-1.1 | 0.0.20250811T192933-1.1 |
| PyPI | ollama | up to and including 0.1.33-NA | — |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20250814T182633-150000.1.98.1 | 0.0.20250814T182633-150000.1.98.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20250814T182633-150000.1.98.1 | 0.0.20250814T182633-150000.1.98.1 |
Same product
ollama: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-37032Ollama before 0.1.34 does not validate the format of the digest (sha256 with 64 hex digits) when getting the model path, and thus mishandles62This week
- CVE-2025-63389A critical authentication bypass vulnerability exists in Ollama platform's API endpoints in versions prior to and including v0.12.3.39Monitor
- CVE-2026-103663Path Traversal leading to Remote Code Execution in Ollama37Monitor
- CVE-2026-7482Ollama heap out-of-bounds read in GGUF tensor parsing leaks server process memory to unauthenticated remote attackers35Monitor
- CVE-2026-102697Ollama 0.14.0 before 0.31.2 Experimental Agent Bash Approval Bypass via Prefix-Based Authorization34Monitor
- CVE-2026-85180Ollama 0.30.0 through 0.33.2 SSRF via Cross-Host Tensor Blob Redirect34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Go:github.com/ollama/ollama | 0.1.34 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20250814T182633-150000.1.98.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20250814T182633-150000.1.98.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-66959167 days apartAn issue in ollama v.0.12.10 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the GGUF decoder32Monitor
- CVE-2025-66960167 days apartAn issue in ollama v.0.12.10 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the fs/ggml/gguf.go, function readGGUFV1String reads 30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.