CVE-2025-32441: Rack session gets restored after deletion
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 16/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: ruby-rack (Debian:11) 2.1.4-3+deb11u4; ruby-rack (Debian:12) 2.2.20-0+deb12u1; ruby-rack (Debian:13) 3.0.8-2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ruby-rack (Debian:11) 2.1.4-3+deb11u4; ruby-rack (Debian:12) 2.2.20-0+deb12u1; ruby-rack (Debian:13) 3.0.8-2 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Rack is a modular Ruby web server interface. Prior to version 2.2.14, when using the `Rack::Session::Pool` middleware, simultaneous rack requests can restore a deleted rack session, which allows the unauthenticated user to occupy that session. Rack session middleware prepares the session at the beginning of request, then saves is back to the store with possible changes applied by host rack application. This way the session becomes to be a subject of race conditions in general sense over concurrent rack requests. When using the `Rack::Session::Pool` middleware, and provided the attacker can acquire a session cookie (already a major issue), the session may be restored if the attacker can trigger a long running request (within that same session) adjacent to the user logging out, in order to retain illicit access even after a user has attempted to logout. Version 2.2.14 contains a patch for the issue. Some other mitigations are available. Either ensure the application invalidates sessions atomically by marking them as logged out e.g., using a `logged_out` flag, instead of deleting them, and check this flag on every request to prevent reuse; or implement a custom session store that tracks session invalidation timestamps and refuses to accept session data if the session was invalidated after the request began.
- Published
- May 7, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 15th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-362
Report tools
Action score
16
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 16 / 40 · 4.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 4.2
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 4.2
- agree
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| rack | rack | cpe:2.3:a:rack:rack |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- rack rackbefore 2.2.14
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
rack rack
- < 2.2.14affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | ruby-rack | before 2.1.4-3+deb11u4 | 2.1.4-3+deb11u4 |
| Debian:12 | ruby-rack | before 2.2.20-0+deb12u1 | 2.2.20-0+deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | ruby-rack | before 3.0.8-2 | 3.0.8-2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | rmt-server | before 2.23-150500.3.34.2 | 2.23-150500.3.34.2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | rubygem-rack | before 2.0.8-150000.3.31.1 | 2.0.8-150000.3.31.1 |
| RubyGems | rack | before 2.2.14 | 2.2.14 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | rubygem-rack | before 2.0.8-150000.3.31.1 | 2.0.8-150000.3.31.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP3 | rmt-server | before 2.23-150300.3.54.1 | 2.23-150300.3.54.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP4 | rmt-server | before 2.23-150400.3.42.1 | 2.23-150400.3.42.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP5 | rmt-server | before 2.23-150500.3.34.2 | 2.23-150500.3.34.2 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP7 | rmt-server | before 2.23-150700.3.6.1 | 2.23-150700.3.6.1 |
Same product
rack: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-25126Rack ReDos in content type parsing (2nd degree polynomial)41Plan
- CVE-2024-26146Possible Denial of Service Vulnerability in Rack Header Parsing31Monitor
- CVE-2023-27530A DoS vulnerability exists in Rack <v3.0.4.2, <v2.2.6.3, <v2.1.4.3 and <v2.0.9.3 within in the Multipart MIME parsing code in which could al31Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-27111Mar 4, 2025 · Escape Sequence Injection vulnerability in Rack lead to Possible Log Injection27Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-27610Mar 10, 2025 · Local File Inclusion in Rack::Static30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-46727May 7, 2025 · Unbounded-Parameter DoS in Rack::QueryParser30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:ruby-rack | 2.2.20-0+deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rmt-server | 2.23-150500.3.34.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:rubygem-rack | 2.0.8-150000.3.31.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| RubyGems:rack | 2.2.14 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:rmt-server | 2.23-150400.3.42.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:rmt-server | 2.23-150500.3.34.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:rubygem-rack | 2.0.8-150000.3.31.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP3 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.