Pexip Infinity before 37.0 has improper input validation in signalling that allows a remote attacker to trigger a software abort via a craft
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.42% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Pexip Infinity before 37.0 has improper input validation in signalling that allows a remote attacker to trigger a software abort via a crafted signalling message, resulting in a denial of service.
- Published
- Dec 25, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 7, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 35th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-617
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · mitre
- 7.5
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| pexip | pexip infinity | cpe:2.3:a:pexip:pexip_infinity |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- pexip pexip infinitybefore 37.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (mitre). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Pexip Infinity
- before 37.0affected
Same product
pexip: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-6551Pexip Infinity before 14.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service restart) or execute arbitrary code via vectors rela40Plan
- CVE-2026-103110Pexip Infinity before 38.2, plus 39.0, 39.1 and 40.0, is affected by improper input validation that allows a remote attacker to execute code39Monitor
- CVE-2020-11805Pexip Reverse Proxy and TURN Server before 6.1.0 has Incorrect UDP Access Control via TURN.39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-37917Apr 2, 2025 · Pexip Infinity before 35.0 has improper input validation that allows remote attackers to trigger a denial of service (software abort) via a 30Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-30080Apr 2, 2025 · Signalling in Pexip Infinity 29 through 36.2 before 37.0 has improper input validation that allows remote attackers to trigger a temporary d30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-32096Dec 25, 2025 · Pexip Infinity 33.0 through 37.0 before 37.1 has improper input validation in signaling that allows an attacker to trigger a software abort,30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-320960 days apartPexip Infinity 33.0 through 37.0 before 37.1 has improper input validation in signaling that allows an attacker to trigger a software abort,30Monitor
- CVE-2025-487040 days apartPexip Infinity 35.0 through 37.2 before 38.0 has Improper Input Validation in signalling that allows an attacker to trigger a software abort30Monitor
- CVE-2025-663790 days apartPexip Infinity before 39.0 has Improper Input Validation in the media implementation, allowing a remote attacker to trigger a software abort30Monitor
- CVE-2026-103099279 days apartPexip Infinity before 41.1 is affected by improper input validation in the media implementation that allows a remote attacker to trigger a s30Monitor
- CVE-2026-103100279 days apartPexip Infinity before 40.1 is affected by improper input validation in the signaling implementation that allows a malicious attacker to trig30Monitor
- CVE-2026-103104279 days apartPexip Infinity before 38.2, plus 39.0, 39.1 and 40.0, is affected by improper input validation in the media implementation which allows a re30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-617 · Reachable AssertionCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.