CVE-2025-32054: In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2024.3, 2024.2.4 source code could be logged in the idea.log file
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 13/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.43% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA 2024.3, 2024.2.4.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA 2024.3, 2024.2.4 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
- Published
- Apr 3, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 38th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-532
Report tools
Action score
13
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 13 / 40 · 3.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · JetBrains
- 3.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| jetbrains | intellij idea | cpe:2.3:a:jetbrains:intellij_idea |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- jetbrains intellij idea2024.2.4 and later · before 2024.3.0
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (JetBrains). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA
- before 2024.3, 2024.2.4affected · semver
Same product
jetbrains: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-64813In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.2 unauthorized settings modification was possible in a Remote Development session40Plan
- CVE-2026-64812In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.2 unauthorized input injection was possible in a Remote Development session40Plan
- CVE-2020-11690In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2020.1, the license server could be resolved to an untrusted host in some cases.40Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-24941Feb 6, 2024 · In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2023.3.3 a plugin for JetBrains Space was able to send an authentication token to an inappropriate URL21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-46970Sep 16, 2024 · In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2024.1 hTML injection via the project name was possible24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-57727Aug 20, 2025 · In JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2025.2 credentials disclosure was possible via remote reference30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA | 2024.3, 2024.2.4 | Vendor (CNA) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2026-75057501 days apartIn JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.1.5 git credentials were written in plaintext to the IDE log24Monitor
- CVE-2026-86501522 days apartIn JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA before 2026.2.2 terminal command input could be written to idea.log11Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-532 · Insertion of Sensitive Information into Log FileCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.