Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2025-30219: RabbitMQ has XSS Vulnerability in an Error Message in Management UI

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
  • Fixed version: azl3 rabbitmq-server 3.13.7-2 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.13.7-2; cbl2 rabbitmq-server 3.11.24-3 on CBL Mariner 2.0 3.11.24-3; cbl2 rabbitmq-server 3.11.24-3 on CBL-Mariner 2.0 3.11.24-3.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 rabbitmq-server 3.13.7-2 on Azure Linux 3.0 3.13.7-2; cbl2 rabbitmq-server 3.11.24-3 on CBL Mariner 2.0 3.11.24-3; cbl2 rabbitmq-server 3.11.24-3 on CBL-Mariner 2.0 3.11.24-3 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Versions prior to 4.0.3 are vulnerable to a sophisticated attack that could modify virtual host name on disk and then make it unrecoverable (with other on disk file modifications) can lead to arbitrary JavaScript code execution in the browsers of management UI users. When a virtual host on a RabbitMQ node fails to start, recent versions will display an error message (a notification) in the management UI. The error message includes virtual host name, which was not escaped prior to open source RabbitMQ 4.0.3 and Tanzu RabbitMQ 4.0.3, 3.13.8. An attack that both makes a virtual host fail to start and creates a new virtual host name with an XSS code snippet or changes the name of an existing virtual host on disk could trigger arbitrary JavaScript code execution in the management UI (the user's browser). Open source RabbitMQ `4.0.3` and Tanzu RabbitMQ `4.0.3` and `3.13.8` patch the issue.

MediumCVSS 6.1 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Mar 25, 2025
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 11th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

24

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
6.1
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2025-30219

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

—

Limit the impact of XSS

This is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. A well-configured Content-Security-Policy doesn't fix it, but greatly reduces its impact. Check your site's CSP and other security headers for free.

Check security headers

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • rabbitmq rabbitmq-server

    • < 4.0.3affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
Debian:12rabbitmq-serverfrom 0—
Debian:13rabbitmq-serverbefore 4.0.5-14.0.5-1
openSUSE:Leap 15.6rabbitmq-serverbefore 3.8.11-150300.3.19.13.8.11-150300.3.19.1
openSUSE:Leap 15.6rabbitmq-server313before 3.13.1-150600.13.8.13.13.1-150600.13.8.1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0rabbitmq-serverbefore 4.1.5-160000.1.14.1.5-160000.1.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedrabbitmq-serverbefore 3.13.7-4.13.13.7-4.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7rabbitmq-serverbefore 3.8.11-150300.3.19.13.8.11-150300.3.19.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7rabbitmq-server313before 3.13.1-150600.13.8.13.13.1-150600.13.8.1
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0rabbitmq-serverbefore 4.1.5-160000.1.14.1.5-160000.1.1

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2024-51988HTTP API's queue deletion endpoint does not verify that the user has a required permission
    26Monitor
  • CVE-2026-67414RabbitMQ AMQP 1.0 parser: amplification memory-exhaustion DoS via zero-width array aggregation
    24Monitor
  • CVE-2026-67418RabbitMQ MQTT 5: inapplicable PUBLISH property disconnects matching subscribers
    21Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • Later →CVE-2026-67416Oct 14, 2026 · RabbitMQ: AMQP 1.0 symbolic body descriptor prefix collisions bypass validation
    21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
azl3 rabbitmq-server 3.13.7-2 on Azure Linux 3.03.13.7-2 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 rabbitmq-server 3.11.24-3 on CBL Mariner 2.03.11.24-3 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
cbl2 rabbitmq-server 3.11.24-3 on CBL-Mariner 2.03.11.24-3 · CBL-Mariner ReleasesMicrosoft (MSRC)
debian:rabbitmq-server4.0.5-1 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:rabbitmq-server3.8.11-150300.3.19.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:rabbitmq-server3133.13.1-150600.13.8.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6Package registry (OSV)
suse:rabbitmq-server3.8.11-150300.3.19.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)
suse:rabbitmq-server3133.13.1-150600.13.8.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP7Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • Administrator privileges are required.
  • No user action is required.
  • Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
none
Availability
low · the service can be disrupted

Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
Low

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L

nvd-secondary

Root cause

User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;

Fixed

ts
commentEl.textContent = comment.body;

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records