CVE-2025-27465: x86: Incorrect stubs exception handling for flags recovery
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 17/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.70% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 53.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: xen (Alpine:v3.19) 4.18.5-r1; xen (Alpine:v3.21) 4.19.2-r2; xen (Alpine:v3.22) 4.20.1-r0.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to xen (Alpine:v3.19) 4.18.5-r1; xen (Alpine:v3.21) 4.19.2-r2; xen (Alpine:v3.22) 4.20.1-r0 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Certain instructions need intercepting and emulating by Xen. In some cases Xen emulates the instruction by replaying it, using an executable stub. Some instructions may raise an exception, which is supposed to be handled gracefully. Certain replayed instructions have additional logic to set up and recover the changes to the arithmetic flags. For replayed instructions where the flags recovery logic is used, the metadata for exception handling was incorrect, preventing Xen from handling the the exception gracefully, treating it as fatal instead.
- Published
- Jul 16, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.7% · 53th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-755
Report tools
Action score
17
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 17 / 40 · 4.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.7%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| xen | xen | cpe:2.3:o:xen:xen |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- xen xen4.9.0 and later
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (XEN). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Xen Xen
- consult Xen advisory XSA-470unknown
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpine:v3.19 | xen | from 4.9.0 · before 4.18.5-r1 | 4.18.5-r1 |
| Alpine:v3.21 | xen | from 4.9.0 · before 4.19.2-r2 | 4.19.2-r2 |
| Alpine:v3.22 | xen | from 4.9.0 · before 4.20.1-r0 | 4.20.1-r0 |
| Debian:12 | xen | before 4.17.5+72-g01140da4e8-1 | 4.17.5+72-g01140da4e8-1 |
| Debian:13 | xen | before 4.20.2+7-g1badcf5035-0+deb13u1 | 4.20.2+7-g1badcf5035-0+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | xen | before 4.20.2+7-g1badcf5035-1 | 4.20.2+7-g1badcf5035-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | xen | before 4.18.5_04-150600.3.28.1 | 4.18.5_04-150600.3.28.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | xen | before 4.20.1_02-1.1 | 4.20.1_02-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | xen | before 4.14.6_26-150300.3.91.1 | 4.14.6_26-150300.3.91.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | xen | before 4.16.7_02-150400.4.72.1 | 4.16.7_02-150400.4.72.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | xen | before 4.17.5_10-150500.3.50.1 | 4.17.5_10-150500.3.50.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | xen | before 4.18.5_04-150600.3.28.1 | 4.18.5_04-150600.3.28.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | xen | before 4.20.1_02-150700.3.8.1 | 4.20.1_02-150700.3.8.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS | xen | before 4.12.4_62-3.130.1 | 4.12.4_62-3.130.1 |
Same product
xen: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2017-10921The grant-table feature in Xen through 4.8.x does not ensure sufficient type counts for a GNTMAP_device_map and GNTMAP_host_map mapping, whi41Plan
- CVE-2017-10920The grant-table feature in Xen through 4.8.x mishandles a GNTMAP_device_map and GNTMAP_host_map mapping, when followed by only a GNTMAP_host41Plan
- CVE-2017-10918Xen through 4.8.x does not validate memory allocations during certain P2M operations, which allows guest OS users to obtain privileged host 41Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-45819Dec 19, 2024 · libxl leaks data to PVH guests via ACPI tables22Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-2201Dec 19, 2024 · A cross-privilege Spectre v2 vulnerability allows attackers to bypass all deployed mitigations, including the recent Fine(IBT), and to leak 21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-1713Jul 17, 2025 · deadlock potential with VT-d and legacy PCI device pass-through30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| alpine:xen | 4.18.5-r1 · Alpine:v3.19 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:xen | 4.17.5+72-g01140da4e8-1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:xen | 4.18.5_04-150600.3.28.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:xen | 4.18.5_04-150600.3.28.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:xen | 4.20.1_02-150700.3.8.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Andrew CooperCitrix.finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- low · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- Low
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-755 · Improper Handling of Exceptional ConditionsCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.