CVE-2025-26618: SSH SFTP packet size not verified properly in Erlang OTP
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.49% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: azl3 erlang 26.2.5.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.9-1; azl3 erlang 26.2.5.9-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.9-1; cbl2 erlang 25.2-3 on CBL Mariner 2.0 25.2-3.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to azl3 erlang 26.2.5.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.9-1; azl3 erlang 26.2.5.9-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 26.2.5.9-1; cbl2 erlang 25.2-3 on CBL Mariner 2.0 25.2-3 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Erlang is a programming language and runtime system for building massively scalable soft real-time systems with requirements on high availability. OTP is a set of Erlang libraries, which consists of the Erlang runtime system, a number of ready-to-use components mainly written in Erlang. Packet size is not verified properly for SFTP packets. As a result when multiple SSH packets (conforming to max SSH packet size) are received by ssh, they might be combined into an SFTP packet which will exceed the max allowed packet size and potentially cause large amount of memory to be allocated. Note that situation described above can only happen for successfully authenticated users after completing the SSH handshake. This issue has been patched in OTP versions 27.2.4, 26.2.5.9, and 25.3.2.18. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.
- Published
- Feb 20, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 43th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-789
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.0 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 7.0
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
erlang otp
- >= OTP-27.0.0, < OTP-27.2.4, >= OTP-26.0.0.0, < OTP-26.2.5.9, < OTP-25.3.2.18affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | erlang | before 1:23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u2 | 1:23.2.6+dfsg-1+deb11u2 |
| Debian:12 | erlang | before 1:25.2.3+dfsg-1+deb12u1 | 1:25.2.3+dfsg-1+deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | erlang | before 1:27.2.4+dfsg-1 | 1:27.2.4+dfsg-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | erlang | before 23.3.4.19-150300.3.17.1 | 23.3.4.19-150300.3.17.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | erlang26 | before 26.2.1-150300.7.8.1 | 26.2.1-150300.7.8.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | erlang | before 27.2.4-2.1 | 27.2.4-2.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | erlang27 | before 27.1.3-3.1 | 27.1.3-3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | erlang | before 23.3.4.19-150300.3.17.1 | 23.3.4.19-150300.3.17.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | erlang26 | before 26.2.1-150300.7.8.1 | 26.2.1-150300.7.8.1 |
Same product
erlang: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-89422TLS 1.3 client skips server authentication when ServerHello carries an unsolicited pre_shared_key extension37Monitor
- CVE-2026-74835inets,httpd: Memory Exhaustion via Unenforced max_body_size During Chunked Body Reception34Monitor
- CVE-2026-71380httpd applies no timeout while receiving a request body, parking a worker on a stalled client34Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-53846Dec 5, 2024 · ssl fails to validate incorrect extened key usage22Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-30211Mar 28, 2025 · KEX init error results with excessive memory usage30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-46712May 8, 2025 · Erlang/OTP SSH Has Strict KEX Violations14Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| azl3 erlang 26.2.5.6-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 26.2.5.9-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| azl3 erlang 26.2.5.9-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 | 26.2.5.9-1 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 erlang 25.2-3 on CBL Mariner 2.0 | 25.2-3 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| cbl2 erlang 25.2-3 on CBL-Mariner 2.0 | 25.2-3 · CBL-Mariner Releases | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:erlang | 1:25.2.3+dfsg-1+deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:erlang | 23.3.4.19-150300.3.17.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:erlang26 | 26.2.1-150300.7.8.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:erlang27 | 27.1.3-3.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:erlang | 23.3.4.19-150300.3.17.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:erlang26 | 26.2.1-150300.7.8.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-3021136 days apartKEX init error results with excessive memory usage30Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-789 · Memory Allocation with Excessive Size ValueCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.