CVE-2025-26529: Stored XSS risk in admin live log
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 24/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.51% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: Moodle Project moodle 4.1.16, 4.3.10, 4.4.6.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 8.3, NVD 6.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Moodle Project moodle 4.1.16, 4.3.10, 4.4.6 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Description information displayed in the site administration live log required additional sanitizing to prevent a stored XSS risk.
- Published
- Feb 24, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 44th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-79
Report tools
Action score
24
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 24 / 40 · 6.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 6.1
- CNA · fedora
- 8.3
- 2.2 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| moodle | moodle | cpe:2.3:a:moodle:moodle |
Limit the impact of XSS
This is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability. A well-configured Content-Security-Policy doesn't fix it, but greatly reduces its impact. Check your site's CSP and other security headers for free.
Check security headersAffected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- moodle moodle4.1.0 and later · before 4.1.16
- moodle moodle4.3.0 and later · before 4.3.10
- moodle moodle4.4.0 and later · before 4.4.6
- moodle moodle4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (fedora). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Moodle Project moodle
- 4.5.0 and later · before 4.5.2affected · semver
- 4.4.0 and later · before 4.4.6affected · semver
- 4.3.0 and later · before 4.3.10affected · semver
- 4.1.0 and later · before 4.1.16affected · semver
- 4.2.0 and later · before 4.2.*unknown · semver
- before 4.0.*unknown · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | moodle/moodle | from 4.3.0-beta · before 4.3.10 | 4.3.10 |
| Packagist | moodle/moodle | from 4.4.0-beta · before 4.4.6 | 4.4.6 |
| Packagist | moodle/moodle | from 4.5.0-beta · before 4.5.2 | 4.5.2 |
| Packagist | moodle/moodle | before 4.1.16 | 4.1.16 |
Same product
moodle: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-43425Moodle: remote code execution via calculated question types60This week
- CVE-2021-36393In Moodle, an SQL injection risk was identified in the library fetching a user's recent courses.55Plan
- CVE-2022-0332A flaw was found in Moodle in versions 3.11 to 3.11.4.52Plan
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-26527Feb 24, 2025 · Non-searchable tags can still be discovered on the tag search page and in the tags block21Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-26528Feb 24, 2025 · Stored XSS in ddimageortext question type24Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-26530Feb 24, 2025 · Reflected XSS via question bank filter24Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Moodle Project moodle | 4.1.16 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Moodle Project moodle | 4.3.10 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Moodle Project moodle | 4.4.6 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Moodle Project moodle | 4.5.2 | Vendor (CNA) |
| Packagist:moodle/moodle | 4.1.16 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:moodle/moodle | 4.3.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:moodle/moodle | 4.4.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| Packagist:moodle/moodle | 4.5.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×2
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:28 | 2025-04-12 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:3 | 2025-06-20 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+46 d
- TodayNov 1, 2026+615 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-265280 days apartStored XSS in ddimageortext question type24Monitor
- CVE-2025-265300 days apartReflected XSS via question bank filter24Monitor
- CVE-2024-43437105 days apartMoodle: xss risk when restoring malicious course backup file24Monitor
- CVE-2024-43439105 days apartMoodle: reflected xss via h5p error message24Monitor
- CVE-2024-38274251 days apartmoodle: stored XSS via calendar's event title when deleting the event24Monitor
- CVE-2024-33997269 days apartmoodle: stored XSS risk when editing another user's equation in equation editor24Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
Impact can extend beyond the vulnerable component (scope changes).
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-79 · Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
User content is inserted into the page as HTML. The browser interprets the content as code rather than data.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-79 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
commentEl.innerHTML = comment.body;Fixed
commentEl.textContent = comment.body;Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.