NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2025-24801: GLPI allows authenticated remote code execution

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Plan (action score 41/100)

Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 21.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 97.5% of all records.
Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
Fixed version: glpi-project glpi 10.0.18.

Add it to your regular patch cycle. Upgrade to glpi-project glpi 10.0.18 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. An authenticated user can upload and force the execution of *.php files located on the GLPI server. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.0.18.

HighCVSS 8.8 · v3.1—Proof of concept Fix available

BDU:2025-03181

Published: Mar 18, 2025
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 21.1% · 97th percentile
CWE: CWE-434

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Plan

Add it to your regular patch cycle.

CVSS: 35 / 40 · 8.8 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 6 / 30 · 21.1%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: none
Automatable: no
Technical impact: total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: 8.8
CNA · GitHub_M: 8.6; 0.2 point gap

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
glpi-project	glpi	cpe:2.3:a:glpi-project:glpi

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

glpi-project glpi0.85 and later · before 10.0.18

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

glpi-project glpi
- >= 0.85, < 10.0.18affected

Same product

glpi-project: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2022-35914/vendor/htmlawed/htmlawed/htmLawedTest.php in the htmlawed module for GLPI through 10.0.2 allows PHP code injection.KEV
99Now
CVE-2025-24799GLPI allows unauthenticated SQL injection through the inventory endpoint
65This week
CVE-2023-46727GLPI SQL injection through inventory agent request
59Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2025-25192Feb 25, 2025 · GLPI allows unauthorized access to debug mode
26Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2025-21619Mar 18, 2025 · GLPI allows SQL injection through the rules configuration
32Monitor
Later →CVE-2025-27514Jul 29, 2025 · GLPI is susceptible to Stored XSS attack through project's kanban
21Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / package	Fixed version	Source
glpi-project glpi	10.0.18 · description	Vendor (CNA)

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×4

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
Source	Kind	Date
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub	stars:1	2025-04-19
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub	stars:3	2025-05-05
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub	stars:0	2026-10-02
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub	stars:0	2026-10-14

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

PublishedMar 18, 2025
First PoCApr 19, 2025+31 d
TodayNov 1, 2026+593 d

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).