Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager and Secure Web Appliance Command Injection Vulnerability
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 28/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.86% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 57.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Web Appliance could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks against an affected device. The attacker must authenticate with valid administrator credentials. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of XML configuration files by an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a crafted XML configuration file. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to inject commands to the underlying operating system with root privileges.
- Published
- Feb 5, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.8% · 57th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-20
Report tools
Action score
28
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.8%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.2
- CNA · cisco
- 6.5
- 0.7 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| cisco | asyncos | cpe:2.3:o:cisco:asyncos |
| cisco | secure email gateway virtual appliance c100v | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_email_gateway_virtual_appliance_c100v |
| cisco | secure email gateway virtual appliance c300v | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_email_gateway_virtual_appliance_c300v |
| cisco | secure email gateway virtual appliance c600v | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_email_gateway_virtual_appliance_c600v |
| cisco | secure email gateway c195 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:secure_email_gateway_c195 |
| cisco | secure email gateway c395 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:secure_email_gateway_c395 |
| cisco | secure email gateway c695 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:secure_email_gateway_c695 |
| cisco | secure web appliance virtual s1000v | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_web_appliance_virtual_s1000v |
| cisco | secure web appliance virtual s100v | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_web_appliance_virtual_s100v |
| cisco | secure web appliance virtual s300v | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_web_appliance_virtual_s300v |
| cisco | secure web appliance virtual s600v | cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_web_appliance_virtual_s600v |
| cisco | secure web appliance s196 | cpe:2.3:h:cisco:secure_web_appliance_s196 |
and 2 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- cisco asyncos11.8.0-414
- cisco asyncos11.8.0-429
- cisco asyncos11.8.0-453
- cisco asyncos11.8.1-023
- cisco asyncos11.8.3-018
- cisco asyncos11.8.3-021
- cisco asyncos11.8.4-004
- cisco asyncos12.0.1-268
- cisco asyncos12.0.1-334
- cisco asyncos12.0.2-004
- cisco asyncos12.0.2-012
- cisco asyncos12.0.3-005
- cisco asyncos12.0.3-007
- cisco asyncos12.0.4-002
- cisco asyncos12.0.5-011
- cisco asyncos12.5.1-011
- cisco asyncos12.5.1-043
- cisco asyncos12.5.2-007
- cisco asyncos12.5.2-011
- cisco asyncos12.5.3-002
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (cisco). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Cisco Cisco Secure Email
- 14.0.0-698, 13.5.1-277, 13.0.0-392, 14.2.0-620, 13.0.5-007, 13.5.4-038, 14.2.1-020, 14.3.0-032, 15.0.0-104, 15.0.1-030, 15.5.0-048, 15.5.1-055 … (+3)affected
Cisco Cisco Secure Web Appliance
- 11.8.0-453, 12.5.3-002, 12.0.3-007, 12.0.3-005, 14.1.0-032, 14.1.0-047, 14.1.0-041, 12.0.4-002, 14.0.2-012, 11.8.0-414, 12.0.1-268, 11.8.1-023 … (+28)affected
Same product
cisco: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-20393Cisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager Remote Command Execution VulnerabilityKEV80Now
- CVE-2026-76461Cisco Secure Email Gateway SQL Injection VulnerabilityKEV78This week
- CVE-2026-76519Cisco Secure Email Gateway Arbitrary File Write VulnerabilityKEV69This week
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-20180Feb 5, 2025 · Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager and Secure Email Gateway Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability19Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-20183Feb 5, 2025 · Cisco Secure Web Appliance Range Request Bypass Vulnerability21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-20185Feb 5, 2025 · Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager, Secure Email Gateway, and Secure Web Appliance Privilege Escalation Vulnerability26Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-20393315 days apartCisco Secure Email Gateway and Cisco Secure Email and Web Manager Remote Command Execution VulnerabilityKEV80Now
- CVE-2025-201830 days apartCisco Secure Web Appliance Range Request Bypass Vulnerability21Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-20 · Improper Input ValidationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Server Side Include (SSI) InjectionCAPEC-101likelihood: High · High
- Cross Zone ScriptingCAPEC-104likelihood: Medium · High
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Object Relational Mapping InjectionCAPEC-109likelihood: Low · High
- SQL Injection through SOAP Parameter TamperingCAPEC-110likelihood: High · Very High
- Double EncodingCAPEC-120likelihood: Low · Medium
- Subverting Environment Variable ValuesCAPEC-13likelihood: High · Very High
ATT&CK techniques
- Obfuscated Files or InformationT1027
- Masquerading: Invalid Code SignatureT1036.001
- Steal Web Session CookieT1539
- Subvert Trust Controls: Code SigningT1553.002
- Impair Defenses:Impair Command History LoggingT1562.003
- Hijack Execution Flow:Dynamic Linker HijackingT1574.006
- Hijack Execution Flow:Path Interception by PATH Environment VariableT1574.007
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.