CVE-2025-20029: BIG-IP iControl REST and tmsh vulnerability
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (GitHub); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 7.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 94.3% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Command injection vulnerability exists in iControl REST and BIG-IP TMOS Shell (tmsh) save command, which may allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary system commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
- Published
- Feb 5, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 7.1% · 94th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Report tools
Action score
36
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 34 / 40 · 8.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 7.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · f5
- 8.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| f5 | big-ip access policy manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_access_policy_manager |
| f5 | big-ip advanced firewall manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_advanced_firewall_manager |
| f5 | big-ip advanced web application firewall | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_advanced_web_application_firewall |
| f5 | big-ip analytics | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_analytics |
| f5 | big-ip application acceleration manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_acceleration_manager |
| f5 | big-ip application security manager | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_security_manager |
| f5 | big-ip application visibility and reporting | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_application_visibility_and_reporting |
| f5 | big-ip automation toolchain | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_automation_toolchain |
| f5 | big-ip carrier-grade nat | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_carrier-grade_nat |
| f5 | big-ip container ingress services | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_container_ingress_services |
| f5 | big-ip ddos hybrid defender | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_ddos_hybrid_defender |
| f5 | big-ip domain name system | cpe:2.3:a:f5:big-ip_domain_name_system |
and 9 more
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- f5 big-ip access policy manager15.1.0 and later · before 15.1.10.6
- f5 big-ip access policy manager16.1.0 and later · before 16.1.5.2
- f5 big-ip access policy manager17.1.0 and later · before 17.1.2.1
- f5 big-ip advanced firewall manager16.1.0 and later · before 16.1.5.2
- f5 big-ip advanced firewall manager17.1.0 and later · before 17.1.2.1
- f5 big-ip advanced firewall manager15.1.0 and later · before 15.1.10.6
- f5 big-ip advanced web application firewall16.1.0 and later · before 16.1.5.2
- f5 big-ip advanced web application firewall15.1.0 and later · before 15.1.10.6
- f5 big-ip advanced web application firewall17.1.0 and later · before 17.1.2.1
- f5 big-ip analytics16.1.0 and later · before 16.1.5.2
- f5 big-ip analytics15.1.0 and later · before 15.1.10.6
- f5 big-ip analytics17.1.0 and later · before 17.1.2.1
- f5 big-ip application acceleration manager16.1.0 and later · before 16.1.5.2
- f5 big-ip application acceleration manager15.1.0 and later · before 15.1.10.6
- f5 big-ip application acceleration manager17.1.0 and later · before 17.1.2.1
- f5 big-ip application security manager16.1.0 and later · before 16.1.5.2
- f5 big-ip application security manager15.1.0 and later · before 15.1.10.6
- f5 big-ip application security manager17.1.0 and later · before 17.1.2.1
- f5 big-ip application visibility and reporting15.1.0 and later · before 15.1.10.6
- f5 big-ip application visibility and reporting16.1.0 and later · before 16.1.5.2
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (f5). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
F5 BIG-IP
- 17.1.0 and later · before 17.1.2.1affected
- 16.1.0 and later · before 16.1.5.2affected
- 15.1.0 and later · before 15.1.10.6affected
Same product
f5: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-1388On F5 BIG-IP 16.1.x versions prior to 16.1.2.2, 15.1.x versions prior to 15.1.5.1, 14.1.x versions prior to 14.1.4.6, 13.1.x versions prior KEV99Now
- CVE-2021-22986On BIG-IP versions 16.0.x before 16.0.1.1, 15.1.x before 15.1.2.1, 14.1.x before 14.1.4, 13.1.x before 13.1.3.6, and 12.1.x before 12.1.5.3 KEV99Now
- CVE-2020-5902In BIG-IP versions 15.0.0-15.1.0.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2.5, 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.1, the Traffic Management User InteKEV99Now
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-41727Aug 14, 2024 · BIG-IP TMM vulnerability34Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-45844Oct 16, 2024 · BIG-IP monitors vulnerability37Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-20045Feb 5, 2025 · BIG-IP SIP MRF Vulnerability34Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×2
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:22 | 2025-02-23 |
| Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub | stars:2 | 2025-05-01 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+17 d
- TodayNov 7, 2026+640 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- F5 acknowledges Matei "Mal" BadanoiuDeloitte for bringing this issue to our attention and following the highest standards of coordinated disclosure.finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-53868252 days apartBIG-IP SCP and SFTP vulnerability34Monitor
- CVE-2026-34176462 days apartKnowledge Appliance mode iControl REST vulnerability34Monitor
- CVE-2026-42924462 days apartBIG-IP iControl SOAP vulnerability34Monitor
- CVE-2024-21782357 days apartBIG-IP and BIG-IQ secure copy vulnerability26Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2024-45844112 days apartBIG-IP monitors vulnerability37Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;
exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;
if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);
execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.