CVE-2025-1801: Aap-gateway: aap-gateway privilege escalation
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 32/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.32% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: ansible.com automation-gateway 2.5.20250305-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to ansible.com automation-gateway 2.5.20250305-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A flaw was found in the Ansible aap-gateway. Concurrent requests handled by the gateway grpc service can result in concurrency issues due to race condition requests against the proxy. This issue potentially allows a less privileged user to obtain the JWT of a greater privileged user, enabling the server to be jeopardized. A user session or confidential data might be vulnerable.
- Published
- Mar 3, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 25th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-362
Report tools
Action score
32
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 32 / 40 · 8.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 8.1
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
ansible.com automation-gateway
- 2.5.0 and later · before 2.5.20250305-1affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 8
- 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.5 for RHEL 9
- 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | automation-gateway | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | automation-gateway-config | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | automation-gateway-server | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9 | automation-gateway | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9 | automation-gateway-config | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap |
| Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el9 | automation-gateway-server | before 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el9ap |
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-11807Eda-server: websocket missing authorization allows credential theft via activation_id spoofing38Monitor
- CVE-2026-12701Pulpcore: pulpcore: relative_path_validator bypass via directory traversal in filesystemexport36Monitor
- CVE-2025-49521Event-driven-ansible: template injection via git branch and refspec in eda projects35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-11483Nov 25, 2024 · Automation-gateway: aap-gateway: improper scope handling in oauth2 tokens for aap 2.520Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-49520Jun 30, 2025 · Event-driven-ansible: authenticated argument injection in git url in eda project creation35Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-5988Aug 4, 2025 · Aap-gateway: csrf origin checking is disabled21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ansible.com automation-gateway | 2.5.20250305-1 | Vendor (CNA) |
| red hat:automation-gateway | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-gateway-config | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:automation-gateway-server | 0:2.5.20250305-1.el8ap · Red Hat:ansible_automation_platform:2.5::el8 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-362 · Concurrent Execution using Shared Resource with Improper Synchronization ('Race Condition')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.