Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2025-15469· NVD / CVE Program· CNA openssl

'openssl dgst' one-shot codepath silently truncates inputs >16MB

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.20% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.5.5, 3.6.1; azl3 openvmm 0.2.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 Release Notes.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to OpenSSL OpenSSL 3.5.5, 3.6.1; azl3 openvmm 0.2.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0 Release Notes or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Issue summary: The 'openssl dgst' command-line tool silently truncates input data to 16MB when using one-shot signing algorithms and reports success instead of an error. Impact summary: A user signing or verifying files larger than 16MB with one-shot algorithms (such as Ed25519, Ed448, or ML-DSA) may believe the entire file is authenticated while trailing data beyond 16MB remains unauthenticated. When the 'openssl dgst' command is used with algorithms that only support one-shot signing (Ed25519, Ed448, ML-DSA-44, ML-DSA-65, ML-DSA-87), the input is buffered with a 16MB limit. If the input exceeds this limit, the tool silently truncates to the first 16MB and continues without signaling an error, contrary to what the documentation states. This creates an integrity gap where trailing bytes can be modified without detection if both signing and verification are performed using the same affected codepath. The issue affects only the command-line tool behavior. Verifiers that process the full message using library APIs will reject the signature, so the risk primarily affects workflows that both sign and verify with the affected 'openssl dgst' command. Streaming digest algorithms for 'openssl dgst' and library users are unaffected. The FIPS modules in 3.5 and 3.6 are not affected by this issue, as the command-line tools are outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.5 and 3.6 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

MediumCVSS 5.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Jan 27, 2026
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 10th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2025-15469

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools

Sign up with email · Have an account? Sign in

Free account, no card. Unfollow any time.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
opensslopenssl

Check your server's TLS configuration

The OpenSSL version can't be seen from outside; the free SSL checker tests your certificate, enabled TLS versions and weak ciphers. Confirm the version on your server with the package manager.

Run the SSL check

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • openssl openssl3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.5
  • openssl openssl3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (openssl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • OpenSSL OpenSSL

    • 3.6.0 and later · before 3.6.1affected · semver
    • 3.5.0 and later · before 3.5.5affected · semver

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
AlmaLinux:10opensslbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.11:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.11:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.11:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1
AlmaLinux:10openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.11:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1
AlmaLinux:9opensslbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
AlmaLinux:9openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
AlmaLinux:9openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
AlmaLinux:9openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
Alpine:v3.22opensslfrom 3.5.0 · before 3.5.5-r03.5.5-r0
Debian:13opensslbefore 3.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.4-1~deb13u2
Debian:14opensslbefore 3.5.5-13.5.5-1
openSUSE:Leap 16.0openssl-3before 3.5.0-160000.5.13.5.0-160000.5.1
openSUSE:Tumbleweedopenssl-3before 3.5.3-2.13.5.3-2.1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1opensslbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1openssl-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1openssl-debugsourcebefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1openssl-develbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1openssl-libsbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1openssl-libs-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1openssl-perlbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el10_11:3.5.1-7.el10_1
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-debugsourcebefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-develbefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7
Red Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstreamopenssl-libs-debuginfobefore 1:3.5.1-7.el9_71:3.5.1-7.el9_7

+12

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2014-0160The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly handle Heartbeat Extension packets, which allows remKEV
    90Now
  • CVE-2021-3711SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
    65This week
  • CVE-2003-0545Double free vulnerability in OpenSSL 0.9.7 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code
    65This week

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-11187Jan 27, 2026 · Improper validation of PBMAC1 parameters in PKCS#12 MAC verification
    26Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2025-15468Jan 27, 2026 · NULL dereference in SSL_CIPHER_find() function on unknown cipher ID
    23Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2025-66199Jan 27, 2026 · TLS 1.3 CompressedCertificate excessive memory allocation
    23Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.5.5Vendor (CNA)
OpenSSL OpenSSL3.6.1Vendor (CNA)
azl3 openvmm 0.2.0-1 on Azure Linux 3.0Release NotesMicrosoft (MSRC)
almalinux:openssl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-devel1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-libs1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
almalinux:openssl-perl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1.alma.1 · AlmaLinux:10Package registry (OSV)
alpine:openssl3.5.5-r0 · Alpine:v3.22Package registry (OSV)
debian:openssl3.5.4-1~deb13u2 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)
opensuse:openssl-33.5.3-2.1 · openSUSE:TumbleweedPackage registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-config-fips0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debuginfo1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-debugsource1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-devel-engine0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 · Red Hat:hummingbird:1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-libs-debuginfo1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
red hat:openssl-perl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Red Hat:enterprise_linux:10.1Package registry (OSV)
rocky linux:openssl1:3.5.1-7.el10_1 · Rocky Linux:10Package registry (OSV)
suse:openssl-33.5.0-160000.5.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
none
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
None

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

nvd-secondary

Root cause

The verifier takes the algorithm to verify with from the token’s own header. Untrusted data ends up deciding its own verification rule.

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

ts
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);

Fixed

ts
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey, {  algorithms: ["RS256"],  issuer: "https://id.example.com",  audience: "portal",});

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records