CVE-2025-11563: wcurl path traversal with percent-encoded slashes
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 18/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.41% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. A user must open a link or visit a page. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: curl (Debian:13) 8.14.1-2+deb13u2; curl (Debian:14) 8.17.0-2; curl (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 8.14.1-150600.4.31.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to curl (Debian:13) 8.14.1-2+deb13u2; curl (Debian:14) 8.17.0-2; curl (openSUSE:Leap 15.6) 8.14.1-150600.4.31.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
URLs containing percent-encoded slashes (`/` or `\`) can trick wcurl into saving the output file outside of the current directory without the user explicitly asking for it. This flaw only affects the wcurl command line tool.
- Published
- Feb 25, 2026
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 36th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-22
Report tools
Action score
18
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 18 / 40 · 4.6 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- curl wcurl2024-12-08 and later · before 2025-11-09
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (curl). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
curl curl
- 8.17.0 and later · up to and including 8.17.0affected · semver
- 8.16.0 and later · up to and including 8.16.0affected · semver
- 8.15.0 and later · up to and including 8.15.0affected · semver
- 8.14.1 and later · up to and including 8.14.1affected · semver
- 8.14.0 and later · up to and including 8.14.0affected · semver
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:13 | curl | before 8.14.1-2+deb13u2 | 8.14.1-2+deb13u2 |
| Debian:14 | curl | before 8.17.0-2 | 8.17.0-2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | curl | before 8.14.1-150600.4.31.1 | 8.14.1-150600.4.31.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 16.0 | curl | before 8.14.1-160000.3.1 | 8.14.1-160000.3.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | curl | before 8.17.0-1.1 | 8.17.0-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.2 | curl | before 8.14.1-150200.4.94.1 | 8.14.1-150200.4.94.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | curl | before 8.14.1-150400.5.72.1 | 8.14.1-150400.5.72.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | curl | before 8.14.1-150600.4.31.1 | 8.14.1-150600.4.31.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | curl | before 8.14.1-150700.7.5.1 | 8.14.1-150700.7.5.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | curl-mini | before 8.14.1-160000.3.1 | 8.14.1-160000.3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.0 | curl | before 8.14.1-2.1 | 8.14.1-2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 | curl | before 8.14.1-slfo.1.1_3.1 | 8.14.1-slfo.1.1_3.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | curl | before 8.14.1-160000.3.1 | 8.14.1-160000.3.1 |
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:curl | 8.14.1-2+deb13u2 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:curl | 8.14.1-150600.4.31.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:curl | 8.14.1-150600.4.31.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:curl | 8.14.1-160000.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:curl-mini | 8.14.1-160000.3.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Stanislav Fort (Aisle Research)finder
- Samuel Henriqueremediation developer
- Sergio Durigan Juniorremediation developer
- Xi Ruoyaoremediation developer
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
The product’s vendor appears in a public program. Matched by name; verify the scope text in the program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- A user must open a link or visit a page.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-22 · Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
nvd-secondary
Root cause
A user-supplied file name is joined with the allowed directory, but the result is never checked to confirm it is still inside that directory.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-22 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const file = path.join(ROOT, req.query.name);
res.sendFile(file);Fixed
const file = path.resolve(ROOT, req.query.name);
if (!file.startsWith(ROOT + path.sep)) {
return res.sendStatus(400);
}
res.sendFile(file);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Path TraversalCAPEC-126likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Slashes and URL Encoding Combined to Bypass Validation LogicCAPEC-64likelihood: High · High
- Manipulating Web Input to File System CallsCAPEC-76likelihood: High · Very High
- Using Escaped Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-78likelihood: High · High
- Using Slashes in Alternate EncodingCAPEC-79likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.