CVE-2025-11418: Tenda CH22 HTTP Request AdvSetWrlsafeset formWrlsafeset stack-based overflow
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 37/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 6.8% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 94.1% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
- Mentioned 1 time in Turkish national cyber security advisories (siberguvenlik.gov.tr).
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda CH22 up to 1.0.0.1. This issue affects the function formWrlsafeset of the file /goform/AdvSetWrlsafeset of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation of the argument mit_ssid_index leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
- Published
- Oct 8, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 8, 2026
- EPSS
- 6.8% · 94th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-119
Report tools
Action score
37
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 35 / 40 · 8.9 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 2 / 30 · 6.8%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulDB
- 9.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Tenda CH22
- 1.0.0.0, 1.0.0.1affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- tenda ch22 firmwareup to 1.0.0.1 inclusive
Same product
tenda: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-46045Tenda CH22 V1.0.0.6(468) has a stack overflow vulnerability located in the frmL7PlotForm function.39Monitor
- CVE-2024-46044CH22 V1.0.0.6(468) has a stack overflow vulnerability located in the fromqossetting function.39Monitor
- CVE-2025-11423Tenda CH22 SafeEmailFilter formSafeEmailFilter memory corruption35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-9813Sep 2, 2025 · Tenda CH22 SetSambaConf formSetSambaConf buffer overflow29Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-11117Sep 28, 2025 · Tenda CH22 GstDhcpSetSer formWrlExtraGet buffer overflow29Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-12232Oct 27, 2025 · Tenda CH22 SafeClientFilter fromSafeClientFilter buffer overflow30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Sxxxw (VulDB User)reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-114230 days apartTenda CH22 SafeEmailFilter formSafeEmailFilter memory corruption35Monitor
- CVE-2025-974838 days apartTenda CH22 httpd IPSECsave fromIpsecitem stack-based overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-5685125 days apartTenda CH22 Natlimit formNatlimit stack-based overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-5619126 days apartTenda CH22 addUserName formaddUserName stack-based overflow34Monitor
- CVE-2025-818074 days apartTenda CH22 deleteUserName formdeleteUserName buffer overflow33Monitor
- CVE-2025-1223519 days apartTenda CH22 SetIpBind fromSetIpBind buffer overflow31Monitor
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-25-0322 · Oct 8, 2025(Tenda CH22 Güvenlik Bildirimi)
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-119 · Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory BufferCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Buffer Overflow via Environment VariablesCAPEC-10likelihood: High · High
- Overflow BuffersCAPEC-100likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer ManipulationCAPEC-123likelihood: High · Very High
- Client-side Injection-induced Buffer OverflowCAPEC-14likelihood: Medium · High
- Filter Failure through Buffer OverflowCAPEC-24likelihood: High · High
- MIME ConversionCAPEC-42likelihood: High · High
- Overflow Binary Resource FileCAPEC-44likelihood: High · Very High
- Buffer Overflow via Symbolic LinksCAPEC-45likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.