CVE-2025-10819: fuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll UserCouponController improper authorization
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 8/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.37% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 5.3, NVD 2.1.
Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A security vulnerability has been detected in fuyang_lipengjun platform 1.0. This issue affects the function UserCouponController of the file /usercoupon/queryAll. The manipulation leads to improper authorization. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
- Published
- Sep 22, 2025
- Updated
- Oct 11, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.3% · 31th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-266
Report tools
Action score
8
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 8 / 40 · 2.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.3%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · VulDB
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- No fixed version yet
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| fuyang lipengjun | platform | cpe:2.3:a:fuyang_lipengjun:platform |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (VulDB). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
fuyang_lipengjun platform
- 1.0affected
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- fuyang lipengjun platform1.0.0
Same product
fuyang lipengjun: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-57213Incorrect access control in the component orderService.queryObject of platform v1.0.0 allows attackers to access sensitive information via…30Monitor
- CVE-2025-57212Incorrect access control in the component ApiOrderService.java of platform v1.0.0 allows attackers to access sensitive information via a…30Monitor
- CVE-2025-57210Incorrect access control in the component ApiPayController.java of platform v1.0.0 allows attackers to access sensitive information via…30Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-10675Sep 18, 2025 · fuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll AttributeController improper authorization8Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-10676Sep 18, 2025 · fuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll BrandController improper authorization8Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-10820Sep 22, 2025 · fuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll TopicController improper authorization8Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- aibot88 (VulDB User)reporter
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-108200 days apartfuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll TopicController improper authorization8Monitor
- CVE-2025-108210 days apartfuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll TopicCategoryController improper authorization8Monitor
- CVE-2025-108221 days apartfuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll SysSmsLogController improper authorization8Monitor
- CVE-2025-106744 days apartfuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll AttributeCategoryController improper authorization8Monitor
- CVE-2025-106754 days apartfuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll AttributeController improper authorization8Monitor
- CVE-2025-106764 days apartfuyang_lipengjun platform queryAll BrandController improper authorization8Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-266 · Incorrect Privilege AssignmentCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log (0)
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
Show all references (2 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.