CVE-2024-9919· NVD / CVE Program· CNA @huntr_ai

Missing Authentication Check in parisneo/lollms-webui

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 33/100)

The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.31% (FIRST EPSS).
Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
According to the record, no fixed version is available yet.

Low priority for now. Update when a fix is released; follow the vendor's advisory.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

A missing authentication check in the uninstall endpoint of parisneo/lollms-webui V13 allows attackers to perform unauthorized directory deletions. The /uninstall/{app_name} API endpoint does not call the check_access() function to verify the client_id, enabling attackers to delete directories without proper authentication.

HighCVSS 8.4 · v3.0—No exploit No fix recorded

Auth bypass

Published: Mar 20, 2025
Updated: Jun 17, 2026
EPSS: 0.3% · 23th percentile
CWE: CWE-306

Report tools

JSON

Action score

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS: 33 / 40 · 8.4 / 10
CISA KEV: 0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS: 0 / 30 · 0.3%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation: proof of concept
Automatable: no
Technical impact: total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD: —
CNA · @huntr_ai: 8.4; NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
No public exploit code on record
No fixed version yet

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens

Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

Vendor	Product	CPE
lollms	lollms web ui	cpe:2.3:a:lollms:lollms_web_ui

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

lollms lollms web ui13

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (@huntr_ai). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

parisneo parisneo/lollms-webui
- unspecified and later · up to and including latestaffected

Same product

lollms: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

CVE-2024-1520OS Command Injection in parisneo/lollms-webui
53Plan
CVE-2024-4320Remote Code Execution due to LFI in '/install_extension' in parisneo/lollms-webui
49Plan
CVE-2024-1600Local File Inclusion in parisneo/lollms-webui
47Plan

Published before and after this one in the same product

← EarlierCVE-2024-8736Mar 20, 2025 · Denial of Service (DoS) via Multipart Boundary in parisneo/lollms-webui
26Monitor
← EarlierCVE-2024-8898Mar 20, 2025 · Path Traversal in parisneo/lollms-webui
39Monitor
Later →CVE-2024-9920Mar 20, 2025 · Unrestricted File Upload and Execution in parisneo/lollms-webui
35Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

CVE-2026-33340369 days apartLoLLMs WEBUI has unauthenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in /api/proxy endpoint
36Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

CVE-2024-99200 days apartUnrestricted File Upload and Execution in parisneo/lollms-webui
35Monitor
CVE-2024-100190 days apartPath Traversal and OS Command Injection in parisneo/lollms-webui
26Monitor
CVE-2024-70580 days apartRelative Path Traversal in parisneo/lollms-webui
17Monitor

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
No account or password is required.
No user action is required.
No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality: high · data can be read
Integrity: high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability: high · the service can be disrupted

Attack vector: Local
Attack complexity: Low
Privileges required: None
User interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality impact: High
Integrity impact: High
Availability impact: High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-306 · Missing Authentication for Critical Function

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-secondary

Root cause

A function added for development or support ships to production without authentication. It often relies on the assumption that it is “only reachable from the internal network.”

The bug in code

The whole CWE-306 class

A representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.

Vulnerable

1// Added for the support team
2app.post("/maintenance/reset", resetDevice);

Fixed

1if (config.maintenanceEnabled) {
2  app.post(
3    "/maintenance/reset",
4    requireSession, requireRole("admin"), resetDevice
5  );
6}

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Attack patterns (CAPEC)

ATT&CK techniques

—

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

All records