CVE-2024-5953: 389-ds-base: malformed userpassword hash may cause denial of service
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.57% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: 389-ds-base (AlmaLinux:8) 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf; 389-ds-base-devel (AlmaLinux:8) 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf; 389-ds-base-legacy-tools (AlmaLinux:8) 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to 389-ds-base (AlmaLinux:8) 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf; 389-ds-base-devel (AlmaLinux:8) 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf; 389-ds-base-legacy-tools (AlmaLinux:8) 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
A denial of service vulnerability was found in the 389-ds-base LDAP server. This issue may allow an authenticated user to cause a server denial of service while attempting to log in with a user with a malformed hash in their password.
- BDU:2025-03459
- ALSA-2024:5192
- ALSA-2024:6569
- DLA-4021-1
- openSUSE-SU-2024:14227-1
- RHSA-2024:4633
- RHSA-2024:4997
- RHSA-2024:5192
- RHSA-2024:5690
- RHSA-2024:6153
- RHSA-2024:6568
- RHSA-2024:6569
- RHSA-2024:6576
- RHSA-2024:7458
- RHSA-2025:1632
- RLSA-2024:5192
- RLSA-2024:6569
- SUSE-SU-2024:2910-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:3082-1
- SUSE-SU-2024:3218-1
- Published
- Jun 18, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.5% · 47th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-1288
Report tools
Action score
22
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 22 / 40 · 5.7 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.5%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · redhat
- 5.7
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (redhat). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
github.com/389ds/389-ds-base 389-ds-base
- all versionsaffected
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.5 E4S for RHEL 8
- 8060020250210084424.0ca98e7e and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.7 for RHEL 8
- 8080020240909040333.f969626e and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 11.9 for RHEL 8
- 8100020240902112955.37ed7c03 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12.2 EUS for RHEL 9
- 9020020240916150035.1674d574 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Directory Server 12.4 for RHEL 9
- 9040020240723122852.1674d574 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
- all versionsunknown
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Extended Lifecycle Support
- 0:1.3.11.1-6.el7_9 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- 8100020240910065753.25e700aa and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Support
- 8080020240807050952.6dbb3803 and laternot affected · rpm
Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- 0:2.4.5-9.el9_4 and laternot affected · rpm
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base | before 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf | 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base-devel | before 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf | 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base-legacy-tools | before 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf | 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base-libs | before 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf | 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf |
| AlmaLinux:8 | 389-ds-base-snmp | before 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf | 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf |
| AlmaLinux:8 | python3-lib389 | before 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf | 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf |
| AlmaLinux:9 | 389-ds-base | before 2.4.5-9.el9_4 | 2.4.5-9.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | 389-ds-base-devel | before 2.4.5-9.el9_4 | 2.4.5-9.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | 389-ds-base-libs | before 2.4.5-9.el9_4 | 2.4.5-9.el9_4 |
| AlmaLinux:9 | python3-lib389 | before 2.4.5-9.el9_4 | 2.4.5-9.el9_4 |
| Debian:11 | 389-ds-base | before 1.4.4.11-2+deb11u1 | 1.4.4.11-2+deb11u1 |
| Debian:12 | 389-ds-base | before 2.3.1+dfsg1-1+deb12u1 | 2.3.1+dfsg1-1+deb12u1 |
| Debian:13 | 389-ds-base | before 3.1.1+dfsg1-1 | 3.1.1+dfsg1-1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | 389-ds | before 2.2.10~git2.345056d3-150500.3.21.1 | 2.2.10~git2.345056d3-150500.3.21.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | 389-ds | before 2.2.10~git18.20ce9289-150500.3.24.1 | 2.2.10~git18.20ce9289-150500.3.24.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | 389-ds | before 2.2.10~git18.20ce9289-150600.8.10.1 | 2.2.10~git18.20ce9289-150600.8.10.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | 389-ds | before 2.2.10~git2.345056d3-150600.8.7.2 | 2.2.10~git2.345056d3-150600.8.7.2 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | 389-ds | before 3.1.1~git0.aef1668-1.1 | 3.1.1~git0.aef1668-1.1 |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base | before 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde | 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base-debuginfo | before 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde | 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base-debugsource | before 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde | 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base-devel | before 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde | 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base-legacy-tools | before 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde | 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde |
| Red Hat:directory_server_e4s:11.5::el8 | 389-ds-base-legacy-tools-debuginfo | before 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde | 0:1.4.3.34-4.module+el8dsrv+22781+5fe99dde |
+96
Same product
red hat: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-11774389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: integer overflow in sasl packet length bypasses size limit leading to heap buffer overflow30Monitor
- CVE-2024-3657389-ds-base: potential denial of service via specially crafted kerberos as-req request30Monitor
- CVE-2025-14905389-ds-base: 389-ds-base: remote code execution and denial of service via heap buffer overflow28Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-2199May 28, 2024 · 389-ds-base: malformed userpassword may cause crash at do_modify in slapd/modify.c22Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| almalinux:389-ds-base | 2.4.5-9.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-devel | 2.4.5-9.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-legacy-tools | 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-libs | 2.4.5-9.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:389-ds-base-snmp | 1.4.3.39-8.module_el8.10.0+3891+cbd883bf · AlmaLinux:8 | Package registry (OSV) |
| almalinux:python3-lib389 | 2.4.5-9.el9_4 · AlmaLinux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| debian:389-ds-base | 2.3.1+dfsg1-1+deb12u1 · Debian:12 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:389-ds | 2.2.10~git2.345056d3-150600.8.7.2 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base | 0:2.2.4-9.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-debuginfo | 0:2.2.4-9.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-debugsource | 0:2.2.4-9.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-devel | 0:2.4.5-7.module+el9dsrv+22137+7a1133f7 · Red Hat:directory_server:12.4::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-legacy-tools | 0:1.4.3.35-5.module+el8.8.0+22193+5f98570a · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-legacy-tools-debuginfo | 0:1.4.3.35-5.module+el8.8.0+22193+5f98570a · Red Hat:rhel_eus:8.8::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-libs | 0:2.2.4-9.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-libs-debuginfo | 0:2.2.4-9.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-snmp | 0:2.4.5-7.module+el9dsrv+22137+7a1133f7 · Red Hat:directory_server:12.4::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:389-ds-base-snmp-debuginfo | 0:2.2.4-9.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:cockpit-389-ds | 0:2.4.5-7.module+el9dsrv+22137+7a1133f7 · Red Hat:directory_server:12.4::el9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:python3-lib389 | 0:2.2.4-9.el9_2 · Red Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| rocky linux:389-ds-base | 0:2.4.5-9.el9_4 · Rocky Linux:9 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:389-ds | 2.2.10~git2.345056d3-150600.8.7.2 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-1288 · Improper Validation of Consistency within InputCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (12 more)Show less
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:4997
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:5192
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:5690
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6153
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6568
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6569
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:6576
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:7458
- access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2025:1632
- access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-5953
- bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292104
- lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/01/msg00015.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.