CVE-2024-55889: phpMyFAQ Vulnerable to Unintended File Download Triggered by Embedded Frames
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 29/100)
- Public proof-of-concept code exists (Exploit-DB); there is no record of exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 2.1% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 82.4% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. Administrator privileges are required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: thorsten/phpmyfaq (Packagist) 3.2.10.
- Severity is disputed: the assigning authority (CNA) scores it 4.9, NVD 7.2.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to thorsten/phpmyfaq (Packagist) 3.2.10 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Prior to version 3.2.10, a vulnerability exists in the FAQ Record component where a privileged attacker can trigger a file download on a victim's machine upon page visit by embedding it in an <iframe> element without user interaction or explicit consent. Version 3.2.10 fixes the issue.
- Published
- Dec 13, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 2.1% · 82th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-451
Report tools
Action score
29
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 28 / 40 · 7.2 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 1 / 30 · 2.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- 7.2
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 4.9
- 2.3 point gap
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- Proof of concept exists, no weaponized module
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| phpmyfaq | phpmyfaq | cpe:2.3:a:phpmyfaq:phpmyfaq |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- phpmyfaq phpmyfaqbefore 3.2.10
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
thorsten phpMyFAQ
- < 3.2.10affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Packagist | thorsten/phpmyfaq | before 3.2.10 | 3.2.10 |
Same product
phpmyfaq: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2025-59943phpMyFAQ duplicate email registration allows multiple accounts with the same email39Monitor
- CVE-2023-5865Insufficient Session Expiration in thorsten/phpmyfaq39Monitor
- CVE-2023-5227Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in thorsten/phpmyfaq39Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-29196Mar 25, 2024 · phpMyFAQ Path Traversal in Attachments10Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-54141Dec 6, 2024 · phpMyFAQ Generates an Error Message Containing Sensitive Information if database server is not available30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-56199Jan 2, 2025 · phpMyFAQ Vulnerable to Stored HTML Injection at FAQ30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Packagist:thorsten/phpmyfaq | 3.2.10 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
Proof of concept available
A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.
Evidence
- Exploit-DB entry ×1
Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.
| Source | Kind | Date |
|---|---|---|
| Exploit-DB entry | webapps | 2025-04-16 |
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
- Published
- First PoC+124 d
- TodayOct 31, 2026+687 d
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-451 · User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical InformationCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
- Internal SpearfishingT1534
- PhishingT1566
- Phishing: Spearfishing AttachmentT1566.001
- Phishing: Spearfishing LinkT1566.002
- Phishing: Spearfishing via ServiceT1566.003
- Phishing for InformationT1598
- Phishing for Information: Spearfishing ServiceT1598.001
- Phishing for Information: Spearfishing AttachmentT1598.002
- Phishing for Information: Spearfishing LinkT1598.003
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.