Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via WS-Eventing affecting multiple models from Brother Industries, Ltd, FUJIFILM Business Innovation, Ricoh,
An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing feature used during a WS-Eventing subscription SOAP operation. The attacker can control all the HTTP data sent in the SSRF connection, but the attacker can not receive any data back from this connection.
- Published
- Jun 25, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 1.0% · 61th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-93
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
21
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 21 / 40 · 5.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 1.0%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · rapid7
- 5.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Affected systems
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (rapid7). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-7090DW
- up to and including Maffected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-7190DN
- up to and including Vaffected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-7190DW
- up to and including Maffected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-7195DW
- up to and including Raffected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-9030CDN
- up to and including ZEaffected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-B7520DW
- up to and including Vaffected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-B7530DN
- up to and including Vaffected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-B7535DW
- up to and including Vaffected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-B7548W
- up to and including 1.16(F)affected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-B7558W
- up to and including 1.16(F)affected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-B7578DW
- up to and including 1.16(F)affected · semver
Brother Industries, Ltd DCP-B7600D
- up to and including 1.20(J)affected · semver
Same product
brother industries, ltd: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2024-51977Unauthenticated leak of sensitive information affecting multiple models from Brother Industries, Ltd., FUJIFILM Business Innovation, Ricoh, Toshiba Tec, and Kon35Monitor
- CVE-2024-51983Unauthenticated Denial of Service (DoS) via malformed WS-Scan request affecting multiple models from Brother Industries, Ltd, FUJIFILM Business Innovation, Rico34Monitor
- CVE-2024-51982Unauthenticated Denial of Service (DoS) via malformed PJL request affecting multiple models from Brother Industries, Ltd, FUJIFILM Business Innovation, and Rico33Monitor
- CVE-2024-51979Authenticated stack based buffer overflow affecting multiple models from Brother Industries, Ltd, FUJIFILM Business Innovation, Ricoh, and Konica Minolta, Inc.28Monitor
- CVE-2024-51984Authenticated disclosure of external service passwords via pass-back attack affecting multiple models from Brother Industries, Ltd, FUJIFILM Business Innovation27Monitor
- CVE-2024-51980Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via WS-Addressing affecting multiple models from Brother Industries, Ltd, FUJIFILM Business Innovation, Ricoh21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
- Stephen Fewer, Principal Security ResearcherRapid7finder
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- low · data can be read
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- Low
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-93 · Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences ('CRLF Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpChange log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- assets.contentstack.io/v3/assets/blte4f029e766e6b253/blt6495b3c6adf2867f/685aa980a26c5e2b1026969c/vulnerability-disclosure-whitepaper.pdf
- github.com/sfewer-r7/BrotherVulnerabilities
- support.brother.com/g/b/link.aspx?prod=group2&faqid=faq00100846_000
- support.brother.com/g/b/link.aspx?prod=group2&faqid=faq00100848_000
- support.brother.com/g/b/link.aspx?prod=lmgroup1&faqid=faqp00100620_000
- www.fujifilm.com/fbglobal/eng/company/news/notice/2025/0625_announce.html
- www.konicaminolta.com/global-en/security/advisory/pdf/km-2025-0001.pdf
- www.rapid7.com/blog/post/multiple-brother-devices-multiple-vulnerabilities-fixed
- www.ricoh.com/products/security/vulnerabilities/vul?id=ricoh-2025-000007
- www.toshibatec.com/information/20250625_02.html
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.