CVE-2024-51746: Use of incorrect Rekor entries during verification in gitsign
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 7/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.11% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. No account or password is required. Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
- Fixed version: github.com/sigstore/gitsign (Go) 0.11.0; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 0.0.20241112T145010-150000.1.17.1; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.0.20241106T172143-1.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to github.com/sigstore/gitsign (Go) 0.11.0; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Leap 15.5) 0.0.20241112T145010-150000.1.17.1; govulncheck-vulndb (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 0.0.20241106T172143-1.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
Gitsign is a keyless Sigstore to signing tool for Git commits with your a GitHub / OIDC identity. gitsign may select the wrong Rekor entry to use during online verification when multiple entries are returned by the log. gitsign uses Rekor's search API to fetch entries that apply to a signature being verified. The parameters used for the search are the public key and the payload. The search API returns entries that match either condition rather than both. When gitsign's credential cache is used, there can be multiple entries that use the same ephemeral keypair / signing certificate. As gitsign assumes both conditions are matched by Rekor, there is no additional validation that the entry's hash matches the payload being verified, meaning that the wrong entry can be used to successfully pass verification. Impact is minimal as while gitsign does not match the payload against the entry, it does ensure that the certificate matches. This would need to be exploited during the certificate validity window (10 minutes) by the key holder.
- Published
- Nov 5, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.1% · 1th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-706
Report tools
Action score
7
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 7 / 40 · 1.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.1%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · GitHub_M
- 1.8
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| sigstore | gitsign | cpe:2.3:a:sigstore:gitsign |
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
sigstore gitsign
- < 0.11.0affected
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Go | github.com/sigstore/gitsign | before 0.11.0 | 0.11.0 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241112T145010-150000.1.17.1 | 0.0.20241112T145010-150000.1.17.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241106T172143-1.1 | 0.0.20241106T172143-1.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | govulncheck-vulndb | before 0.0.20241112T145010-150000.1.17.1 | 0.0.20241112T145010-150000.1.17.1 |
Same product
sigstore: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2026-44310gitsign --verify panics on empty-certificate PKCS7 and exits 0, bypassing exit-code callers21Monitor
- CVE-2026-44309gitsign verify accepts signatures over go-git-normalized bytes, enabling trust confusion on malformed commits21Monitor
- CVE-2023-47122Gitsign's Rekor public keys fetched from upstream API instead of local TUF client.21Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Go:github.com/sigstore/gitsign | 0.11.0 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20241112T145010-150000.1.17.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:govulncheck-vulndb | 0.0.20241112T145010-150000.1.17.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · variant or chain candidate · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- Special conditions such as timing or configuration are required.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- Integrity
- Availability
- Attack vector
- Local
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- A
- Scope
- X
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-706 · Use of Incorrectly-Resolved Name or ReferenceCVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.