CVE-2024-48949: The verify function in lib/elliptic/eddsa/index.js in the Elliptic package before 6.5.6 for Node.js omits "sig.S().gte(sig.eddsa.curve.n) ||
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 36/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.49% (FIRST EPSS).
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM 3.1.1-13; CBL Mariner 2.0 x64 3.1.1-13.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM 3.1.1-13; CBL Mariner 2.0 x64 3.1.1-13 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
The verify function in lib/elliptic/eddsa/index.js in the Elliptic package before 6.5.6 for Node.js omits "sig.S().gte(sig.eddsa.curve.n) || sig.S().isNeg()" validation.
- Published
- Oct 9, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.4% · 42th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-347
Report tools
Action score
36
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 36 / 40 · 9.1 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.4%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| indutny | elliptic | cpe:2.3:a:indutny:elliptic |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- indutny ellipticbefore 6.5.6
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | node-elliptic | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | node-elliptic | before 6.5.7+dfsg-1 | 6.5.7+dfsg-1 |
| npm | elliptic | before 6.5.6 | 6.5.6 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | aws-cli | before 1.33.26-150400.34.7.1 | 1.33.26-150400.34.7.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | pgadmin4 | before 8.5-150600.3.6.1 | 8.5-150600.3.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-boto3 | before 1.34.138-150400.27.7.1 | 1.34.138-150400.27.7.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-botocore | before 1.34.144-150400.41.7.1 | 1.34.144-150400.41.7.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-coverage | before 7.6.10-150400.12.6.1 | 7.6.10-150400.12.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-flaky | before 3.8.1-150400.14.6.1 | 3.8.1-150400.14.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-pluggy | before 1.5.0-150400.14.10.1 | 1.5.0-150400.14.10.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-pytest | before 8.3.5-150400.3.9.1 | 8.3.5-150400.3.9.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-pytest-cov | before 6.2.1-150400.12.6.1 | 6.2.1-150400.12.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | python-pytest-mock | before 3.14.0-150400.13.6.1 | 3.14.0-150400.13.6.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | python-pytest-html | before 4.2.0-4.1 | 4.2.0-4.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | python-pytest-html | before 4.1.1-2.1 | 4.1.1-2.1 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana-azure-monitor | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana-cloudwatch | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana-debuginfo | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana-elasticsearch | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana-graphite | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana-influxdb | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana-loki | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
| Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | grafana-mssql | before 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 |
+16
Same product
indutny: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2020-13822The Elliptic package 6.5.2 for Node.js allows ECDSA signature malleability via variations in encoding, leading '\0' bytes, or integer overfl31Monitor
- CVE-2020-28498Cryptographic Issues27Monitor
- CVE-2024-42460In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, ECDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing check for whether the leading bit 21Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-42459Aug 2, 2024 · In the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus z21Monitor
- Later →CVE-2024-48948Oct 15, 2024 · The Elliptic package 6.5.7 for Node.js, in its for ECDSA implementation, does not correctly verify valid signatures if the hash contains at 19Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM | 3.1.1-13 · reaper | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 x64 | 3.1.1-13 · reaper | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:node-elliptic | 6.5.7+dfsg-1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| npm:elliptic | 6.5.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:aws-cli | 1.33.26-150400.34.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:pgadmin4 | 8.5-150600.3.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-boto3 | 1.34.138-150400.27.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-botocore | 1.34.144-150400.41.7.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-coverage | 7.6.10-150400.12.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-flaky | 3.8.1-150400.14.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-pluggy | 1.5.0-150400.14.10.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-pytest | 8.3.5-150400.3.9.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-pytest-cov | 6.2.1-150400.12.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-pytest-html | 4.1.1-2.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:python-pytest-mock | 3.14.0-150400.13.6.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana | 0:7.3.6-8.el8_4 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.4::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-azure-monitor | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-cloudwatch | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-debuginfo | 0:7.3.6-8.el8_4 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.4::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-elasticsearch | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-graphite | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-influxdb | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-loki | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-mssql | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-mysql | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-opentsdb | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| red hat:grafana-postgres | 0:6.3.6-6.el8_2 · Red Hat:rhel_aus:8.2::appstream | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:aws-cli | 1.33.26-150400.34.7.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:pgadmin4 | 8.5-150600.3.6.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Python 3 15 SP6 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:python-boto3 | 1.34.138-150400.27.7.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP4 | Package registry (OSV) |
+6
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2024-4245968 days apartIn the Elliptic package 6.5.6 for Node.js, EDDSA signature malleability occurs because there is a missing signature length check, and thus z21Monitor
- CVE-2024-489486 days apartThe Elliptic package 6.5.7 for Node.js, in its for ECDSA implementation, does not correctly verify valid signatures if the hash contains at 19Monitor
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- none
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- None
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-347 · Improper Verification of Cryptographic SignatureCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
nvd-primary
Root cause
The verifier takes the algorithm to verify with from the token’s own header. Untrusted data ends up deciding its own verification rule.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-347 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);Fixed
const claims = jwt.verify(token, publicKey, {
algorithms: ["RS256"],
issuer: "https://id.example.com",
audience: "portal",
});Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
- blog.trailofbits.com/2025/11/18/we-found-cryptography-bugs-in-the-elliptic-library-using-wycheproof/
Show all references (3 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.