Skip to content
Noroxi
NVD / CVE Program· CNA GitHub_M

CVE-2024-47763: Wasmtime runtime crash when combining tail calls with trapping imports

Noroxi assessment

Priority: Monitor (action score 22/100)

  • The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
  • Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.24% (FIRST EPSS).
  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
  • Fixed version: bytecodealliance wasmtime 21.0.2.

Low priority for now. Upgrade to bytecodealliance wasmtime 21.0.2 or later.

Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it

Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS

Wasmtime is an open source runtime for WebAssembly. Wasmtime's implementation of WebAssembly tail calls combined with stack traces can result in a runtime crash in certain WebAssembly modules. The runtime crash may be undefined behavior if Wasmtime was compiled with Rust 1.80 or prior. The runtime crash is a deterministic process abort when Wasmtime is compiled with Rust 1.81 and later. WebAssembly tail calls are a proposal which relatively recently reached stage 4 in the standardization process. Wasmtime first enabled support for tail calls by default in Wasmtime 21.0.0, although that release contained a bug where it was only on-by-default for some configurations. In Wasmtime 22.0.0 tail calls were enabled by default for all configurations. The specific crash happens when an exported function in a WebAssembly module (or component) performs a `return_call` (or `return_call_indirect` or `return_call_ref`) to an imported host function which captures a stack trace (for example, the host function raises a trap). In this situation, the stack-walking code previously assumed there was always at least one WebAssembly frame on the stack but with tail calls that is no longer true. With the tail-call proposal it's possible to have an entry trampoline appear as if it directly called the exit trampoline. This situation triggers an internal assert in the stack-walking code which raises a Rust `panic!()`. When Wasmtime is compiled with Rust versions 1.80 and prior this means that an `extern "C"` function in Rust is raising a `panic!()`. This is technically undefined behavior and typically manifests as a process abort when the unwinder fails to unwind Cranelift-generated frames. When Wasmtime is compiled with Rust versions 1.81 and later this panic becomes a deterministic process abort. Overall the impact of this issue is that this is a denial-of-service vector where a malicious WebAssembly module or component can cause the host to crash. There is no other impact at this time other than availability of a service as the result of the crash is always a crash and no more. This issue was discovered by routine fuzzing performed by the Wasmtime project via Google's OSS-Fuzz infrastructure. We have no evidence that it has ever been exploited by an attacker in the wild. All versions of Wasmtime which have tail calls enabled by default have been patched: * 21.0.x - patched in 21.0.2 * 22.0.x - patched in 22.0.1 * 23.0.x - patched in 23.0.3 * 24.0.x - patched in 24.0.1 * 25.0.x - patched in 25.0.2. Wasmtime versions from 12.0.x (the first release with experimental tail call support) to 20.0.x (the last release with tail-calls off-by-default) have support for tail calls but the support is disabled by default. These versions are not affected in their default configurations, but users who explicitly enabled tail call support will need to either disable tail call support or upgrade to a patched version of Wasmtime. The main workaround for this issue is to disable tail support for tail calls in Wasmtime, for example with `Config::wasm_tail_call(false)`. Users are otherwise encouraged to upgrade to patched versions.

MediumCVSS 5.5 · v3.1—No exploit Fix available
Published
Oct 9, 2024
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.2% · 15th percentile

Report tools

JSON

Action score

22

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
22 / 40 · 5.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
no
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · GitHub_M
5.5
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Get told when this record changes

  • Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
  • No public exploit code on record
  • A fix has been released

If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.

Follow CVE-2024-47763

When you'll hear from us

  • when it enters CISA KEV
  • when exploit code appears or is weaponized
  • when the record is updated (including a fixed version)
  • when EPSS rises 20 points in a week

One daily email digest (06:00 UTC); connect a webhook for KEV listings and weaponized exploits instantly.

Your free account also gets you

  • Stack alerts: add the products and versions you run, get the new CVEs that affect them
  • Uptime monitoring: 1 site, instant email when it goes down
  • Add your domain: subdomains and takeover risk scanned every week (1 domain)
  • 10 scans an hour on the security tools (3 a day without an account), an API key and MCP
  • All your scans in one panel: findings, what changed in the last scan, a report per domain or per client (PDF, share link)
All free tools
Is your version affected? Check it

Noroxi analysis

What does it mean in your environment?

The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.

We use this product, ask for help

Affected systems

Is your version affected?

Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.

VendorProduct
bytecodealliancewasmtime

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • bytecodealliance wasmtime21.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime21.0.1
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime22.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime23.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime23.0.1
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime23.0.2
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime24.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime25.0.0
  • bytecodealliance wasmtime25.0.1

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (GitHub_M). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • bytecodealliance wasmtime

    • >= 21.0.0, < 21.0.2, >= 22.0.0, < 22.0.1, >= 23.0.0, < 23.0.3, >= 24.0.0, < 24.0.1, >= 25.0.0, < 25.0.2affected

Package-level exposure

OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.

EcosystemPackageAffected rangeFix
crates.iowasmtimefrom 12.0.0 · before 21.0.221.0.2
crates.iowasmtimefrom 21.0.0 · before 21.0.221.0.2
crates.iowasmtimefrom 22.0.0 · before 22.0.122.0.1
crates.iowasmtimefrom 23.0.0 · before 23.0.323.0.3
crates.iowasmtimefrom 24.0.0 · before 24.0.124.0.1
crates.iowasmtimefrom 25.0.0 · before 25.0.225.0.2
Debian:13rust-wasmtimebefore 21.0.2+dfsg-121.0.2+dfsg-1
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 25.0.0—
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 21.0.0—
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 25.0.1—
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 21.0.1—
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 22.0.0—
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 23.0.0—
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 23.0.1—
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 23.0.2—
PyPIwasmtime-binup to and including 24.0.0—

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2026-115893Wasmtime: Cranelift backend on aarch64 can jump to incorrect target on large Wasm `br_table` instruction
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2026-115889Wasmtime: Bit-packing in Cranelift compiler causes silent overflow and miscompilation
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2022-39394wasmtime_trap_code C API function has out of bounds write vulnerability
    39Monitor

Published before and after this one in the same product

  • ← EarlierCVE-2023-41880Sep 15, 2023 · Miscompilation of wasm `i64x2.shr_s` instruction with constant input on x86_64
    21Monitor
  • ← EarlierCVE-2024-30266Apr 4, 2024 · Wasmtime vulnerable to panic when using a dropped extenref-typed element segment
    22Monitor
  • Later →CVE-2024-47813Oct 9, 2024 · Wasmtime race condition could lead to WebAssembly control-flow integrity and type safety violations
    11Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

Product / packageFixed versionSource
bytecodealliance wasmtime21.0.2 · descriptionVendor (CNA)
crates.io:wasmtime21.0.2Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime22.0.1Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime23.0.3Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime24.0.1Package registry (OSV)
crates.io:wasmtime25.0.2Package registry (OSV)
debian:rust-wasmtime21.0.2+dfsg-1 · Debian:13Package registry (OSV)

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

No nightly-computed relations.

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Someone with local access to the system can trigger it.
  • A low-privileged account is enough.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.

Change log

  1. Fix✗ → ✓

For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →

References

All records