CVE-2024-44070: An issue was discovered in FRRouting (FRR) through 10.1.
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 30/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.64% (FIRST EPSS); higher than 50.9% of all records.
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it. No account or password is required. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- According to CISA the attack is automatable: targets can be found by mass scanning.
- Fixed version: Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 9.1.1-2; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 9.1.1-2; CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM 8.5.5-1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to Azure Linux 3.0 ARM 9.1.1-2; Azure Linux 3.0 x64 9.1.1-2; CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM 8.5.5-1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
An issue was discovered in FRRouting (FRR) through 10.1. bgp_attr_encap in bgpd/bgp_attr.c does not check the actual remaining stream length before taking the TLV value.
- Published
- Aug 18, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.6% · 50th percentile
- CWE
- —
Report tools
Action score
30
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.6%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- yes
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Running WordPress? Scan your site free with WP Lens
Noroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| frrouting | frrouting | cpe:2.3:a:frrouting:frrouting |
| redhat | enterprise linux | cpe:2.3:o:redhat:enterprise_linux |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- frrouting frroutingup to 10.1 inclusive
- redhat enterprise linux8.0
- redhat enterprise linux9.0
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:11 | frr | before 7.5.1-1.1+deb11u3 | 7.5.1-1.1+deb11u3 |
| Debian:12 | frr | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | frr | before 10.1-0.2 | 10.1-0.2 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | frr | before 8.4-150500.4.26.1 | 8.4-150500.4.26.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | frr | before 8.5.6-150500.4.30.1 | 8.5.6-150500.4.30.1 |
| openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | quagga | before 1.1.1-150400.12.8.1 | 1.1.1-150400.12.8.1 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | frr | before 10.0.1-2.1 | 10.0.1-2.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP2-LTSS | quagga | before 1.1.1-150000.4.6.1 | 1.1.1-150000.4.6.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | frr | before 7.4-150300.4.29.1 | 7.4-150300.4.29.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | frr | before 8.4-150500.4.26.1 | 8.4-150500.4.26.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | frr | before 8.5.6-150500.4.30.1 | 8.5.6-150500.4.30.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | quagga | before 1.1.1-150400.12.8.1 | 1.1.1-150400.12.8.1 |
| SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | quagga | before 1.1.1-17.13.1 | 1.1.1-17.13.1 |
Same product
frrouting: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2023-38406bgpd/bgp_flowspec.c in FRRouting (FRR) before 8.4.3 mishandles an nlri length of zero, aka a "flowspec overflow."39Monitor
- CVE-2023-41361An issue was discovered in FRRouting FRR 9.0.39Monitor
- CVE-2022-37032An out-of-bounds read in the BGP daemon of FRRouting FRR before 8.4 may lead to a segmentation fault and denial of service.37Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-31951Apr 7, 2024 · In the Opaque LSA Extended Link parser in FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ext_26Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-34088Apr 30, 2024 · In FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, it is possible for the get_edge() function in ospf_te.c in the OSPF daemon to return a NULL pointer.30Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-61099Oct 27, 2025 · FRRouting/frr from v2.0 through v10.4.1 was discovered to contain a NULL pointer dereference via the opaque_info_detail function at ospf_opa30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Azure Linux 3.0 ARM | 9.1.1-2 · frr | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| Azure Linux 3.0 x64 | 9.1.1-2 · frr | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 ARM | 8.5.5-1 · frr | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| CBL Mariner 2.0 x64 | 8.5.5-1 · frr | Microsoft (MSRC) |
| debian:frr | 10.1-0.2 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:frr | 8.4-150500.4.26.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:quagga | 1.1.1-150400.12.8.1 · openSUSE:Leap 15.5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:frr | 7.4-150300.4.29.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:frr | 8.4-150500.4.26.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:quagga | 1.1.1-150400.12.8.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
| suse:quagga | 1.1.1-17.13.1 · SUSE:Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 12 SP5 | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
No history yet (it accumulates with the daily EPSS job).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
No nightly-computed relations.
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
—
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
- No account or password is required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- none
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- None
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
—
CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd-primary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
MITRE has no CAPEC/ATT&CK mapping for this CWE.
Change log
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Show all references (1 more)Show less
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.