DrayTek Vigor3910 devices through 4.3.2.6 are affected by an OS command injection vulnerability that allows an attacker to leverage the recv
DrayTek Vigor3910 devices through 4.3.2.6 are affected by an OS command injection vulnerability that allows an attacker to leverage the recvCmd binary to escape from the emulated instance and inject arbitrary commands into the host machine.
- Published
- Oct 3, 2024
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.8% · 55th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-78
Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.
Report tools
Action score
27
Monitor
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 27 / 40 · 6.8 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.8%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- proof of concept
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- total
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
Noroxi analysis
No Noroxi analysis for this record yet
We don't hand-write analysis for the hundreds of thousands of vulnerabilities in the database; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
| Vendor | Product | CPE |
|---|---|---|
| draytek | vigor3910 firmware | cpe:2.3:o:draytek:vigor3910_firmware |
| draytek | vigor3910 | cpe:2.3:h:draytek:vigor3910 |
Affected versions
NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.
- draytek vigor3910 firmwareup to 4.3.2.6 inclusive
Same product
draytek: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2022-32548An issue was discovered on certain DrayTek Vigor routers before July 2022 such as the Vigor3910 before 4.3.1.1.49Plan
- CVE-2024-41589DrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 use unencrypted HTTP for authentication requests.35Monitor
- CVE-2024-41595DrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 allow a remote attacker to change settings or cause a denial of service via .cgi pages because of m32Monitor
- CVE-2024-41586A stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in DrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code v32Monitor
- CVE-2024-46598Draytek Vigor 3910 v4.3.2.6 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the iprofileidx parameter at dialin.cgi.30Monitor
- CVE-2024-46597Draytek Vigor 3910 v4.3.2.6 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow in the sPubKey parameter at dialin.cgi.30Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).
Patch and commit links
Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.
No commit or PR link among the references.
Credits
All researchersFinders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.
No credits in the CNA record.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
—
Chain candidates
An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.
- CVE-2024-415890 days apartDrayTek Vigor310 devices through 4.3.2.6 use unencrypted HTTP for authentication requests.35Monitor
Bug bounty scope
No known public program.
Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).
National notice (Türkiye Cybersecurity Directorate / USOM)
Official security notices citing this record; remediation advice is on the agency's page.
- TR-24-1601 · Oct 4, 2024(DrayTek Çoklu Ürün Güvenlik Zafiyeti)
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- Administrator privileges are required.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- high · data can be read
- Integrity
- high · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- High
- Integrity impact
- High
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-78 · Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd-secondary
Root cause
User input is inserted as text into a shell command. The shell may interpret special characters in the input as part of the command.
The bug in code
The whole CWE-78 classA representative example of this vulnerability class. Not the vendor's source code; it shows the faulty pattern and its fix.
Vulnerable
const host = req.body.host;exec("ping -c 1 " + host, onResult);Fixed
const host = req.body.host;if (!/^[a-z0-9.-]{1,253}$/i.test(host)) return res.sendStatus(400);execFile("ping", ["-c", "1", host], onResult);Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
- Command Line Execution through SQL InjectionCAPEC-108likelihood: Low · Very High
- Command DelimitersCAPEC-15likelihood: High · High
- Exploiting Multiple Input Interpretation LayersCAPEC-43likelihood: Medium · High
- Argument InjectionCAPEC-6likelihood: High · High
- OS Command InjectionCAPEC-88likelihood: High · High
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log
No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.
References
- www.forescout.com/resources/draybreak-draytek-research/
- www.forescout.com/resources/draytek14-vulnerabilities
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.