CVE-2024-38805: iSCSI Remote Memory Corruption and Denial of Service
Noroxi assessment
Priority: Monitor (action score 25/100)
- The sources we track (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, Metasploit, Nuclei, GitHub) show no public exploit code or exploitation in the wild.
- Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days: 0.23% (FIRST EPSS).
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it. A low-privileged account is enough. No user action is required. No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
- Fixed version: edk2 (Debian:13) 2025.02-8+deb13u1; edk2 (Debian:14) 2025.02-9; ovmf (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 202505-2.1.
Low priority for now. Upgrade to edk2 (Debian:13) 2025.02-8+deb13u1; edk2 (Debian:14) 2025.02-9; ovmf (openSUSE:Tumbleweed) 202505-2.1 or later.
Generated automatically from the record's data: CVSS (NVD and CNA), CISA KEV and SSVC, FIRST EPSS, exploit sources, fixed versions. How we calculate it
Primary sources: NVD · CVE.org · FIRST EPSS
EDK2 contains a vulnerability in BIOS where a user may cause an Integer Overflow or Wraparound by network means. A successful exploitation of this vulnerability may lead to denial of service.
- Published
- Aug 12, 2025
- Updated
- Jun 17, 2026
- EPSS
- 0.2% · 14th percentile
- CWE
- CWE-190
Report tools
Action score
25
Low priority for now.
- CVSS
- 25 / 40 · 6.3 / 10
- CISA KEV
- 0 / 30 · Not listed
- EPSS
- 0 / 30 · 0.2%
CISA SSVC decision
- Exploitation
- none
- Automatable
- no
- Technical impact
- partial
Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.
CNA vs NVD score
- NVD
- —
- CNA · TianoCore
- 6.3
- NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.
The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.
Get told when this record changes
- Not in KEV: no record of exploitation in the wild
- No public exploit code on record
- A fix has been released
If any of these changes, we'll tell you in the daily email digest.
Is your version affected? Check itNoroxi analysis
What does it mean in your environment?
The assessment above is generated automatically from the record's data; it doesn't know your environment. Our team verifies on your systems whether this vulnerability is actually exploitable and which mitigation is enough.
We use this product, ask for helpAffected systems
Is your version affected?
Pick the product and type the version you run. It's compared with this record's version ranges in your browser; the version isn't sent anywhere.
—
Versions reported by the vendor
Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (TianoCore). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.
TianoCore EDK2
- up to and including edk2-stable202502affected · Custom
Package-level exposure
OSV and GitHub Advisory data: ecosystem, package and range. SBOM matching uses this table.
| Ecosystem | Package | Affected range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian:12 | edk2 | from 0 | — |
| Debian:13 | edk2 | before 2025.02-8+deb13u1 | 2025.02-8+deb13u1 |
| Debian:14 | edk2 | before 2025.02-9 | 2025.02-9 |
| openSUSE:Tumbleweed | ovmf | before 202505-2.1 | 202505-2.1 |
Same product
tianocore: all recordsOther highest-scoring records for the same primary product.
- CVE-2021-38578Existing CommBuffer checks in SmmEntryPoint will not catch underflow when computing BufferSize.39Monitor
- CVE-2026-97631Pre-boot RCE in EDK II PXE driver38Monitor
- CVE-2023-45235Buffer Overflow in EDK II Network Package35Monitor
Published before and after this one in the same product
- ← EarlierCVE-2024-38797Apr 7, 2025 · Out-of-bounds Read in HashPeImageByType()18Monitor
- ← EarlierCVE-2025-3770Aug 6, 2025 · SMM IDT Privilege Escalation Vulnerability28Monitor
- Later →CVE-2025-2486Nov 26, 2025 · UEFI Shell accessible in AAVMF with Secure Boot enabled on Ubuntu14Monitor
Remediation
Which version to upgrade to
Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.
| Product / package | Fixed version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| debian:edk2 | 2025.02-8+deb13u1 · Debian:13 | Package registry (OSV) |
| opensuse:ovmf | 202505-2.1 · openSUSE:Tumbleweed | Package registry (OSV) |
Exploit status
No known public exploit
No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.
Research context
For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.
Timeline
From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.
No dated events beyond publication.
Variant candidates
Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.
- CVE-2025-2295151 days apartPotential iSCSI R2T PDU Vulnerability14Monitor
Not on record for this CVE: EPSS history · patch commit or PR link · researcher credit · public bounty program.
Technical details
Attack conditions
- Someone on the same network segment can trigger it.
- A low-privileged account is enough.
- No user action is required.
- No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.
If successful
- Confidentiality
- none
- Integrity
- low · data or configuration can be modified
- Availability
- high · the service can be disrupted
- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality impact
- None
- Integrity impact
- Low
- Availability impact
- High
Weakness class (CWE)
CWE-190 · Integer Overflow or WraparoundCVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
nvd-secondary
Attack context
MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.
Attack patterns (CAPEC)
ATT&CK techniques
—
Change log (1)
- Fix✗ → ✓
For records you follow, these changes also arrive as notifications. →
References
Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.