Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2024-38077· NVD / CVE Program· CNA microsoft

Windows Remote Desktop Licensing Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

CriticalCVSS 9.8 · v3.1—Proof of concept No fix recorded
Published
Jul 9, 2024
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
84.2% · 100th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

64

This week

Don’t wait for the next maintenance window.

CVSS
39 / 40 · 9.8 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
25 / 30 · 84.2%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
total

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

CNA vs NVD score

NVD
—
CNA · microsoft
9.8
NVD has not scored this yet; the score shown is the CNA’s.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

The score given by the assigning authority versus NVD’s independent score. A gap means the severity is contested.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
microsoftwindows server 2008
microsoftwindows server 2012
microsoftwindows server 2016
microsoftwindows server 2019
microsoftwindows server 2022
microsoftwindows server 2022 23h2

Using windows server 2008? Add it to your stack and be the first to know about CVEs like this one. (Windows Server, Active Directory)

Add to my stack

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • microsoft windows server 2008all versions
  • microsoft windows server 2008r2
  • microsoft windows server 2012all versions
  • microsoft windows server 2012r2
  • microsoft windows server 2016before 10.0.14393.7159
  • microsoft windows server 2019before 10.0.17763.6054
  • microsoft windows server 2022before 10.0.20348.2582
  • microsoft windows server 2022 23h2before 10.0.25398.1009

Versions reported by the vendor

Affected version ranges reported by the assigning authority (microsoft). Independent of NVD's CPE analysis and usually ahead of it.

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2

    • 6.0.6003.0 and later · before 6.0.6003.22769affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1

    • 6.1.7601.0 and later · before 6.1.7601.27219affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation)

    • 6.1.7601.0 and later · before 6.1.7601.27219affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2

    • 6.0.6003.0 and later · before 6.0.6003.22769affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation)

    • 6.0.6003.0 and later · before 6.0.6003.22769affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2012

    • 6.2.9200.0 and later · before 6.2.9200.24975affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)

    • 6.2.9200.0 and later · before 6.2.9200.24975affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2

    • 6.3.9600.0 and later · before 6.3.9600.22074affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)

    • 6.3.9600.0 and later · before 6.3.9600.22074affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2016

    • 10.0.14393.0 and later · before 10.0.14393.7159affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)

    • 10.0.14393.0 and later · before 10.0.14393.7159affected

  • Microsoft Windows Server 2019

    • 10.0.17763.0 and later · before 10.0.17763.6054affected

Same product

microsoft: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2020-1350A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Windows Domain Name System servers when they fail to properly handle requests, aka 'Windows KEV
    99Now
  • CVE-2020-1040A remote code execution vulnerability exists when Hyper-V RemoteFX vGPU on a host server fails to properly validate input from an authenticaKEV
    68This week
  • CVE-2009-3103Array index error in the SMBv2 protocol implementation in srv2.sys in Microsoft Windows Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold a
    68This week
  • CVE-2009-2532Microsoft Windows Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2, Windows Server 2008 Gold and SP2, and Windows 7 RC do not properly process the command value in
    59Plan
  • CVE-2018-8476A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that Windows Deployment Services TFTP Server handles objects in memory, aka "Windows
    58Plan
  • CVE-2010-0239The TCP/IP implementation in Microsoft Windows Vista Gold, SP1, and SP2 and Server 2008 Gold and SP2, when IPv6 is enabled, does not properl
    58Plan

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

Proof of concept available

A public proof of concept or detection signature exists. Exploit knowledge is out there; don't delay patching.

Evidence

  • Proof-of-concept repository on GitHub ×16

Noroxi does not host or link to exploit code. Metasploit module names and Nuclei template ids are shown (names, not code); Exploit-DB entries and PoC repositories are given as counts only.

Public exploit evidence
SourceKindDate
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:92024-08-09
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02024-08-09
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:2242024-08-09
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:12024-08-09
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:132024-08-09
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:32024-08-09
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:12024-08-09
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:72024-08-10
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:02024-08-10
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:22024-08-10
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:72024-08-15
Proof-of-concept repository on GitHubstars:22024-08-23

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

  1. Published
  2. First PoC+30 d
  3. TodaySep 29, 2026+812 d
EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2023-28231455 days apartDHCP Server Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
    46Plan
  • CVE-2025-21208217 days apartWindows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2025-21410217 days apartWindows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
    36Monitor
  • CVE-2024-3812035 days apartWindows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2024-3812135 days apartWindows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
    35Monitor
  • CVE-2024-3815435 days apartWindows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
    35Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
high · data can be read
Integrity
high · data or configuration can be modified
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
High
Integrity impact
High
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-122 · Heap-based Buffer Overflow

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

ATT&CK techniques

—

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records