Skip to content
Noroxi
CVE-2024-36734· NVD / CVE Program· CNA mitre

Improper input validation in OneFlow-Inc.

Improper input validation in OneFlow-Inc. Oneflow v0.9.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via inputting a negative value into the dim parameter.

HighCVSS 7.5 · v3.1—No exploit No fix recorded
Published
Jun 6, 2024
Updated
Jun 17, 2026
EPSS
0.5% · 42th percentile
Follow this CVE

Sign in to follow · You’ll be notified if a followed record enters KEV, gets an exploit or is updated.

Report tools

JSON

Action score

30

Monitor

Low priority for now.

CVSS
30 / 40 · 7.5 / 10
CISA KEV
0 / 30 · Not listed
EPSS
0 / 30 · 0.5%

CISA SSVC decision

Exploitation
none
Automatable
yes
Technical impact
partial

Vulnrichment: CISA's decision-tree inputs.

Affected systems

VendorProduct
oneflowoneflow

Affected versions

NVD version ranges (for catalog products). Add the product to your stack with a version and matching uses these.

  • oneflow oneflow0.9.1

Same product

oneflow: all records

Other highest-scoring records for the same primary product.

  • CVE-2024-36736An issue in the oneflow.permute component of OneFlow-Inc.
    39Monitor
  • CVE-2025-71007An input validation vulnerability in the oneflow.index_add component of OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) v
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-71003An input validation vulnerability in the flow.arange() component of OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-71000An issue in the flow.cuda.BoolTensor component of OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-70999A GPU device-ID validation flaw in the flow.cuda.get_device_capability() component of OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to cause a Denial of S
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-65891A GPU device-ID validation flaw in OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to trigger a Denial of Dervice (DoS) by invoking flow.cuda.get_device_pro
    30Monitor

Remediation

Which version to upgrade to

Fix versions compiled from the vendor, package registries and Microsoft. Verify the vendor's note before upgrading.

No fix version is recorded for this entry. Check the references for vendor advisories.

Exploit status

No known public exploit

No public exploit has been observed yet. That doesn't mean you're safe, only that the bar is a little higher.

Research context

For pentesters and researchers: attack profile, score disagreement, timeline, patch commits, credits, variant and chain candidates, bug bounty scope. All derived from existing data; no exploit code.

Timeline

From publication to today: proof of concept, Metasploit module, CISA KEV and fix record. Dates are as reported by the sources.

No dated events beyond publication.

EPSS, last 120 days

FIRST EPSS daily score; only changes of 0.01 or more are recorded (step chart).

Patch and commit links

Commit, PR and diff links among the references. A starting point for patch-diffing and variant hunting; fixes, not exploits.

No commit or PR link among the references.

Credits

All researchers

Finders, reporters and analysts named in the CNA record. Click a name for that researcher’s other records.

No credits in the CNA record.

Variant candidates

Same product, same weakness class, within 18 months. If the patch missed the root cause, the sibling bug is here.

  • CVE-2024-367370 days apartImproper input validation in OneFlow-Inc.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2024-367420 days apartAn issue in the oneflow.scatter_nd parameter OneFlow-Inc.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2024-367450 days apartAn issue in OneFlow-Inc.
    30Monitor
  • CVE-2025-63397522 days apartImproper input validation in OneFlow v0.9.0 allows attackers to cause a segmentation fault via adding a Python sequence to the native code d
    26Monitor

Chain candidates

An authentication bypass and a privilege-requiring bug in the same product, published close together: combined they may become an unauthenticated path.

—

Bug bounty scope

No known public program.

Source: bounty-targets-data (public HackerOne, Bugcrowd, Intigriti, YesWeHack listings).

Technical details

Attack conditions

  • Anyone who can reach it over the internet can trigger it.
  • No account or password is required.
  • No user action is required.
  • No special conditions are required; it is repeatable.

If successful

Confidentiality
none
Integrity
none
Availability
high · the service can be disrupted
Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality impact
None
Integrity impact
None
Availability impact
High

Weakness class (CWE)

CWE-20 · Improper Input Validation

CVSS vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd-secondary

Attack context

MITRE CAPEC attack patterns and ATT&CK techniques for this weakness class (CWE). A starting point for detection rules and threat hunting.

Noroxi analysis

No Noroxi analysis for this record yet

We don't hand-write analysis for all 385,000+ vulnerabilities; that wouldn't be honest. For notable, high-impact vulnerabilities our team writes the mechanism, detection and remediation steps.

We use this product, ask for help

Change log

No changes recorded on tracked fields yet. Score, KEV, exploit maturity and fix status changes appear here.

References

Vendor advisories and official records. Exploit/PoC links are deliberately left out.

All records